Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi, Joseph.
>
> On Thursday, 12 August 2010 20:00:29 +,
> Joseph L. Casale wrote:
>
> > I've been following this thread in hopes of uncovering the reason why
> > the op would even compile himself for a platform that has precompiled
> > binaries available (lets forgo th
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 01:17:11 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > > It looks like you are running a 64-bit bacula-sd, so the libraries
> > > should be in /usr/lib64.
> > >
> > > The files you found are in /usr/lib, which are normally 32-bit.
> > > Either you have the 32-bit libraries install
Hi, Joseph.
On Thursday, 12 August 2010 20:00:29 +,
Joseph L. Casale wrote:
> >> Indeed, I'm using CentOS 5.5 amd64. I was not doing the
> >> installation with RPM packages, but compile the source code
> >> obtained at the official site of Bacula. On sunday, doing tests
> >> comparing with th
>> Indeed, I'm using CentOS 5.5 amd64. I was not doing the installation
>> with RPM packages, but compile the source code obtained at the official
>> site of Bacula. On sunday, doing tests comparing with the installation
>> done with packages RPM, I realized that the difference was in which the
>>
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Indeed, I'm using CentOS 5.5 amd64. I was not doing the installation
> with RPM packages, but compile the source code obtained at the official
> site of Bacula. On sunday, doing tests comparing with the installation
> done with packages RPM, I realized that the difference wa
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:17:11 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said:
>
> On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 00:46:06 -0300,
> Daniel Bareiro wrote:
>
> > > It looks like you are running a 64-bit bacula-sd, so the libraries
> > > should be in /usr/lib64.
> > >
> > > The files you found are in /usr/lib, which
On Wednesday, 11 August 2010 00:46:06 -0300,
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> > It looks like you are running a 64-bit bacula-sd, so the libraries
> > should be in /usr/lib64.
> >
> > The files you found are in /usr/lib, which are normally 32-bit.
> > Either you have the 32-bit libraries installed by acci
Hi, Martin.
On Monday, 09 August 2010 13:35:43 +0100,
Martin Simmons wrote:
> > > what is the output of 'ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-sd' ?
> > # ldd /usr/sbin/bacula-sd
> > libz.so.1 => /usr/lib64/libz.so.1 (0x0032b900)
> > libbacpy-5.0.1.so => not found
> > libbaccfg-5.
> On Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:03:41 -0300, Daniel Bareiro said:
>
> On Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:19:50 +0200,
> Pierre Bourgin wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> Hi, Pierre.
>
> But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following
> errors:
>
> [r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/in
On Thursday, 29 July 2010 09:19:50 +0200,
Pierre Bourgin wrote:
> Hello,
Hi, Pierre.
But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following
errors:
[r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula start
Starting the Bacula Storage daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-sd: error wh
Hello,
On 07/23/2010 11:52 AM, Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> On Friday, 23 July 2010 02:13:51 +0200,
> Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>
>> Hi there Daniel!
>
> Hi, Jeroen!
>
>>> But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following
>>> errors:
>>>
>>> [r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula sta
On Friday, 23 July 2010 02:13:51 +0200,
Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> Hi there Daniel!
Hi, Jeroen!
> > But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following
> > errors:
> >
> > [r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula start
> > Starting the Bacula Storage daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-sd:
Daniel Bareiro wrote:
> Hi all!
>
Hi there Daniel!
> But when trying to run the startup script, I get the following errors:
>
> [r...@localhost scripts]# /etc/init.d/bacula start
> Starting the Bacula Storage daemon /usr/sbin/bacula-sd: error while loading
shared libraries:
> libbacpy-5.0.1.so
Hi all!
I'm installing Bacula 5.0.2 on RHEL 5.5 using the following procedure
after having downloaded the bacula-5.0.2.tar.gz tarball:
# ./configure \
--prefix=/usr \
--sbindir=/usr/sbin \
--sysconfdir=/etc/bacula \
--with-scriptdir=/etc/bacula/scripts \
--enable-smartalloc \
--with-openssl
14 matches
Mail list logo
