Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-26 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Hi, it's me again. I'm following the book to configure my bacula but can't >find the bacula script to start bacula-dir, bacula-sd and bacula-fd should >be in somewhere but "locate bacula" does not find this file. Remember >I installed from repos recomended by Joseph so I miss something or I >need

Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-26 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Hi, it's me again. I'm following the book to configure my bacula but can't find the bacula script to start bacula-dir, bacula-sd and bacula-fd should be in somewhere but "locate bacula" does not find this file. Remember I installed from repos recomended by Joseph so I miss something or I need to st

Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-26 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>The funky things is we build for pure stock release and CentOS 6 has only >postgresql 8.4.4 Maybe you missed the OPs query about the libpq.so.4 dep? Not sure what provides that? I saw that in a recent build, looks like its resolved now as it correctly requires libpq.so.5. >jlc : about the cle

Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-26 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Hi Bruno and yes you're right in CentOS 6 only PostgreSQL 8.4.4 is present but I get latest 9.1.2 from PostgreSQL repositories and for that my problem, any way I have installed now Bacula 5.3 (latest) and PostgreSQL 9.1.2-4 thanks to the Bacula Community and I will continue using Bacula for a long

Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-26 Thread Bruno Friedmann
On 12/26/2011 01:47 PM, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > Thanks Joseph it works like a charm, I did not know about this repo and few > days ago I ask about the same in the list and it was > several answers as for example: symlink libpq.so.4 to libpq.so.5, use SuSE > repositories and none works unti

Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-26 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Thanks Joseph it works like a charm, I did not know about this repo and few days ago I ask about the same in the list and it was several answers as for example: symlink libpq.so.4 to libpq.so.5, use SuSE repositories and none works until now. Cheers and happy new year Ing. Reynier Pérez Mira Cel

Re: [Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-25 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>Hi and happy new year to every, I'm just wondering if it's possible to use >Bacula with >PostgreSQL 9.1.x because I'm trying several ways and have not luck because it >ask for > libpq.so.4. Which is not available at CentOS 6.  >I tried to fake the repos enabling CentOS 5 but then get this other

[Bacula-users] It's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x?

2011-12-25 Thread reynie...@gmail.com
Hi and happy new year to every, I'm just wondering if it's possible to use Bacula with PostgreSQL 9.1.x because I'm trying several ways and have not luck because it ask for libpq.so.4. Which is not available at CentOS 6. Error: Package: bacula-catalog-postgresql-5.2.3-180.1.x86_64 (Archiving_Backu