Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michel Meyers wrote: > Arno Lehmann wrote: >> Hi, > >> 04.09.2007 20:56,, Timo Neuvonen wrote:: >> I don't think it will. It sounds like the "relabel" command actually >> requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool, >>

Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Arno Lehmann wrote: > Hi, > > 04.09.2007 20:56,, Timo Neuvonen wrote:: > I don't think it will. It sounds like the "relabel" command actually > requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool, > remove any data on it,

Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi, 04.09.2007 20:56,, Timo Neuvonen wrote:: I don't think it will. It sounds like the "relabel" command actually requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool, remove any data on it, etc. It's like starting over. I don't want to do that. I have jobs r

Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Timo Neuvonen
>>> I don't think it will. It sounds like the "relabel" command actually >>> requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool, >>> remove any data on it, etc. It's like starting over. I don't want to >>> do that. I have jobs running on the tape. In fact, one job was >>> part

Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Server Gremlin
Michel Meyers wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Server Gremlin wrote: > >> I don't think it will. It sounds like the "relabel" command actually >> requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool, >> remove any data on it, etc. It's like starting

Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Michel Meyers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Server Gremlin wrote: > I don't think it will. It sounds like the "relabel" command actually > requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool, > remove any data on it, etc. It's like starting over. I don't want to > do that.

Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Server Gremlin
Mike Eggleston wrote: > On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Server Gremlin might have said: > > >> Hello, >> >> I used the "label" command to label a new tape for bacula, and I >> made a typo when I labeled the tape. Something like "MyTpe" instead of >> "MyTape". (Obviously I've chosen a better naming

Re: [Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Mike Eggleston
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Server Gremlin might have said: > Hello, > > I used the "label" command to label a new tape for bacula, and I > made a typo when I labeled the tape. Something like "MyTpe" instead of > "MyTape". (Obviously I've chosen a better naming convention than this, > but just

[Bacula-users] Relabel a Tape (Because of a typo)

2007-09-04 Thread Server Gremlin
Hello, I used the "label" command to label a new tape for bacula, and I made a typo when I labeled the tape. Something like "MyTpe" instead of "MyTape". (Obviously I've chosen a better naming convention than this, but just to illustrate...) Bacula is so cool that it automatically mou