Hello,
I used the label command to label a new tape for bacula, and I
made a typo when I labeled the tape. Something like MyTpe instead of
MyTape. (Obviously I've chosen a better naming convention than this,
but just to illustrate...)
Bacula is so cool that it automatically mounts
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Server Gremlin might have said:
Hello,
I used the label command to label a new tape for bacula, and I
made a typo when I labeled the tape. Something like MyTpe instead of
MyTape. (Obviously I've chosen a better naming convention than this,
but just to
Mike Eggleston wrote:
On Tue, 04 Sep 2007, Server Gremlin might have said:
Hello,
I used the label command to label a new tape for bacula, and I
made a typo when I labeled the tape. Something like MyTpe instead of
MyTape. (Obviously I've chosen a better naming convention than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Server Gremlin wrote:
I don't think it will. It sounds like the relabel command actually
requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool,
remove any data on it, etc. It's like starting over. I don't want to
do that. I
Michel Meyers wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Server Gremlin wrote:
I don't think it will. It sounds like the relabel command actually
requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool,
remove any data on it, etc. It's like starting over. I
I don't think it will. It sounds like the relabel command actually
requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool,
remove any data on it, etc. It's like starting over. I don't want to
do that. I have jobs running on the tape. In fact, one job was
part-way done on one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
04.09.2007 20:56,, Timo Neuvonen wrote::
I don't think it will. It sounds like the relabel command actually
requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool,
remove any data on it, etc. It's like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Michel Meyers wrote:
Arno Lehmann wrote:
Hi,
04.09.2007 20:56,, Timo Neuvonen wrote::
I don't think it will. It sounds like the relabel command actually
requires you to first trash the volume; ie, remove it from the pool,
remove any data on
