Hello Robert,
I´m affraid the spool directory is a device directive. I have it
configured in my device:
Device {
...
Spool Directory = /opt/bacula/spool
Maximum Spool Size = 20 G
}
Best regards,
Ana
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Robert A Threet rober...@netzero.net
wrote:
Ok, I
Ok, I greatly increased my spool sizes. It appears to be placing the
spool in /opt/bacula/working (I'm using BaculaSystems 6). I read there
was a Spool Directory = parameter. I put it in the Tape Pool definition.
After doing that, bacula wouldn't start. I have about 4-6TB of disk I wish
to
Looks like I have about 4TB of local SAS drives to play with on my Dell 720.
I was thinking of bumping up Maximum Spool Size x10 = 240GB
And x10 the Maximum Job Spool Size to 80G.
Based on this, it seems logical that Maximum Concurrent Jobs = 3 (not 21 as in
current config).
Q: Does this sound
I'm going to try to reply to all the responses I got together.
Have you tried backing up other hosts on your network? What are
the speeds with these hosts? I've noticed that different host
respond with varying speeds despite being on the same network.
Wondering if this has to do the client OS
Is the MySQL database storage on the same RAID array you are
writing backups to?
Yes and no. Currently, in our dev environment, they are both on the same
physical RAID array, but Bacula operates in a separate jail from mySQL. When
we move to production, the director will probably run on
Without attribute spooling or batch (not sure if that
is postgres only) after each file is read the database
needs to add records.
We have attribute spooling activated right now.
Tim Gustafson
Baskin School of Engineering
UC Santa Cruz
t...@soe.ucsc.edu
831-459-5354
Compare against a stock, non tuned, Bacula install. Are you
going between building where you get the slow transfer speed?
UCSC has 1 Gb links between buildings from my recollection. The
link to the outside world is not much more than that. Bacula
also has a batch mode which you can twiddle
On Mon, 04 Oct 2010 19:37:32 +0200, Tim Gustafson t...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
However, we're getting pretty pitiful throughput numbers. When I scp a
file from my workstation to the Bacula server, I get something like
40MB/s (320Mb/s). When Bacula runs, we're lucky to get 20MB/s
We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula director and storage daemon run on a box
with about 6 terabytes of RAID6 storage (SATA 300 drives, 1TB each, Adaptec
RAID controller with 512MB cache). The box has 16GB of RAM and
-Original Message-
From: Tim Gustafson [mailto:t...@soe.ucsc.edu]
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2010 10:38 AM
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [Bacula-users] Tuning Bacula
We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula
On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Tim Gustafson t...@soe.ucsc.edu wrote:
We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula director and storage daemon run on a
box with about 6 terabytes of RAID6 storage (SATA 300 drives, 1TB each,
On 10/4/10 10:37 AM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula director and storage daemon run on a
box with about 6 terabytes of RAID6 storage (SATA 300 drives, 1TB each,
Adaptec RAID controller
On 10/4/2010 1:37 PM, Tim Gustafson wrote:
We have recently installed Bacula onto a FreeBSD server and several Linux,
SunOS and FreeBSD clients. The Bacula director and storage daemon run on a
box with about 6 terabytes of RAID6 storage (SATA 300 drives, 1TB each,
Adaptec RAID controller
On 04/10/10, Tim Gustafson (t...@soe.ucsc.edu) wrote:
...we're getting pretty pitiful throughput numbers. When I scp a file
from my workstation to the Bacula server, I get something like 40MB/s
(320Mb/s). When Bacula runs, we're lucky to get 20MB/s (160Mb/s), and
we often get numbers closer
14 matches
Mail list logo
