I'm starting to think there's more to this. Shouldn't this have worked?
[root@tiger ~]# dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing install
bacula-storage-mysqlLast metadata expiration check: 0:09:20 ago on Wed 20 Jun
2018 17:39:52 BST.Package bacula-storage-9.0.7-6.fc29.x86_64 is already
installed,
Hi,
I did the dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula*
and it worked! I now have what appears to be a good bacula install, and since I
preserved the config and db tables thought I was good to go. I have been using
bacula for years, and through many Fedora updates where it just
Did a
dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula*
and it appeared OK except for the following:
Running scriptlet: bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64
13/14
/sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
warning: %postun(bacula-libs-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64) scriptlet
I've created new updates, they are here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-98ccf382ee
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-5156ca7a45
Just wait until they reach testing and do a:
dnf --enablerepo=updates-testing update bacula*
Or just pick up stuff from here:
Dammit - of course the title to all this should have read "Upgraded to Fedora
28". F29 isn't relevant at all.
On Monday, 11 June 2018, 11:54:10 BST, Bill Damage via Bacula-users
wrote:
Hope this helps - from a different installation, running perfectly, a routine
"dnf update" just
Hope this helps - from a different installation, running perfectly, a routine
"dnf update" just gave this, so there's definitely a problem with these
dependencies:
[root@sabbath ~]# dnf updateFedora 28 - x86_64 - Updates
Working on it, sorry for the delay.
Regards,
--Simone
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 11:44 AM, Bill Damage via Bacula-users <
bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> I can't understand the "nothing provides message". It must come from
> somewhere since it's a bacula-dir dependency. Where does it
I can't understand the "nothing provides message". It must come from somewhere
since it's a bacula-dir dependency. Where does it come from on a successful
install? I'd have thought bacula-libs-sql, so I tried removing and reinstalling
that too, but it made no difference.
On Wednesday, 6
This is also a problem on Fedora 27 see below:
Problem 1: cannot install the best update candidate for package
bacula-director-9.0.6-2.fc27.x86_64
- nothing provides libbaccats-9.0.7.so()(64bit) needed by
bacula-director-9.0.7-2.fc27.x86_64
Problem 2: cannot install the best update
I've since found I'm not the first. Here's exactly the same issue with F28,
without a resolution I could find.Bug 1588514 – Cannot upgrade to bacula
9.0.7-3.fc28
|
|
| |
Bug 1588514 – Cannot upgrade to bacula 9.0.7-3.fc28
|
|
|
On Wednesday, 6 June 2018, 09:07:23 BST, Bill
In desperation after the upgrade I removed bacula hoping a reinstall would fix
the broken dependencies but got floored by this:
[root@tiger bacula]# bacula-dirbash: bacula-dir: command not found...Install
package 'bacula-director' to provide command 'bacula-dir'? [N/y] y
* Waiting in queue...
11 matches
Mail list logo
