Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use order

2022-11-22 Thread Arno Lehmann
Hi Karl, just to round off Bill's answer -- the explanation why the 003 volume was used is probably because it was still loaded in the drive after labeling. Had you explicitly unloaded it, you would have fond that volume 001 would have been used. Just to reiterate -- Bacula is supposed to

Re: [Bacula-users] Volume use order

2022-11-22 Thread Bill Arlofski via Bacula-users
On 11/22/22 01:52, Mag. Dr. Karl Kashofer wrote: Hi ! I created a pool of three volumes from LTO7 tapes. I used the barcodes of the tapes which are in ascending order. The tapes were added to the pool in the same order, so tape 001 has MediaID 1, tape 002 has MediaID 2 etc. This was done using

[Bacula-users] Volume use order

2022-11-22 Thread Mag. Dr. Karl Kashofer
Hi ! I created a pool of three volumes from LTO7 tapes. I used the barcodes of the tapes which are in ascending order. The tapes were added to the pool in the same order, so tape 001 has MediaID 1, tape 002 has MediaID 2 etc. This was done using bacula 11. Now i started the first backup job on