Bacula sucks the vital essence from your computer says the slogan... and
somehow it now looks true to me (though not the way it was meant to)
After years of some experience with LinuxBacula combination, I finally
started making some experiments with Windows client. After a few very (not
so
Timo,.
Your test involved just 600 some MB of data which may not be a large or
varied enough data set. There is data and then there is data. Millions of
small email index files is harder on Bacula than thousands of large files.
And you don't mentioned if or how you controlled for your network
On 1/25/2010 11:07 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
some more cpu load, but no peak in workstation's cpu load meter exceeded
50%.
In Windows, 100% load means all CPU's together at max load. If you have
two cores, 50% means 100% load on one core.
So you're seeing the best that CPU can do (and
Mike Ruskai than...@earthlink.net kirjoitti viestissä
news:4b5dcf2f.9050...@earthlink.net...
On 1/25/2010 11:07 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
some more cpu load, but no peak in workstation's cpu load meter exceeded
50%.
In Windows, 100% load means all CPU's together at max load. If you have
mehma sarja mehmasa...@gmail.com kirjoitti viestissä
news:ec5d34681001250830h9cfb180naea17beb1a544...@mail.gmail.com...
Timo,.
Your test involved just 600 some MB of data which may not be a large or
varied enough data set. There is data and then there is data. Millions of
small email index files
On 1/25/2010 2:46 PM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
Mike Ruskaithan...@earthlink.net kirjoitti viestissä
news:4b5dcf2f.9050...@earthlink.net...
On 1/25/2010 11:07 AM, Timo Neuvonen wrote:
some more cpu load, but no peak in workstation's cpu load meter exceeded
50%.
In Windows,
Elapsed time: 2 mins 35 secs
Priority: 10
FD Files Written: 4,648
SD Files Written: 4,648
FD Bytes Written: 664,739,011 (664.7 MB)
SD Bytes Written: 665,458,318 (665.4 MB)
Rate: 4288.6 KB/s
Software
