[Bacula-users] bacula-sd dmesg output

2011-05-16 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, for a couple of weeks now I occasionally see messages like these in the kernel log or our bacula server (bacula 5.0.3 compiled from source on centos 5.6 64bit): ## INFO: task bacula-sd:12467 blocked for more than 120

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-sd dmesg output

2011-05-16 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:39:38AM -0400, John Drescher wrote: Maybe do what it says. echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs John Hi John, thanks for your reply, I was wondering if it's an error that I need to look info or bacula's expected behaviour in those circumstances.

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-sd dmesg output

2011-05-16 Thread John Drescher
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:39:38AM -0400, John Drescher wrote: Maybe do what it says. echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs John Hi John, thanks for your reply, I was wondering if it's an error

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-sd dmesg output

2011-05-16 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Mon, 16 May 2011 08:39:38 -0400 John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: for a couple of weeks now I occasionally see messages like these in the kernel log or our bacula server (bacula 5.0.3 compiled from source on centos 5.6 64bit):

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-sd dmesg output

2011-05-16 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:50:25AM -0400, John Drescher wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 8:45 AM, Uwe Schuerkamp uwe.schuerk...@nionex.net wrote: On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:39:38AM -0400, John Drescher wrote: Maybe do what it says. echo 0 /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs John