14:10
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.1 and db issues - please, share your
experience
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:03:39PM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Koldo Santisteban wrote:
Hello
I am working
|
|+---++--+--+-+---+-+--++--++-+
Are these the right ones?
Thanks,
Jan Jaap
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2010 14:53:54 +0200
From: ksantiste...@gmail.com
To: evan.fra...@rms.com
CC: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.1 and db issues - please,share
your experience
Creating indexes solve performance issues
Thanks for this, it fixed my problem.
Cheers, Evan.
-Original Message-
From: Graham Keeling [mailto:gra...@equiinet.com]
Sent: 13 April 2010 14:10
To: bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] bacula 5.0.1 and db issues - please, share your
experience
On Tue, Apr
Thanks for your answers.
Stephen, do you use bconsole or bat? Perhaps the issue is only on bat. I
recognize that i only use bweb and bat (on windows).
Regarding your comments Stephen, my bacula server is smaller than yours, but
my catalog size was 400 Mb (Baculas is working since 2 months ago). I
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 03:29:29PM +0200, Koldo Santisteban wrote:
Thanks for your answers.
Stephen, do you use bconsole or bat? Perhaps the issue is only on bat. I
recognize that i only use bweb and bat (on windows).
For what it's worth, I used bconsole, and it was extremly slow (20+ hours)
I mostly use bat for restores (i.e. building restore tree).
I did nothing with my tables regarding indexing. I have whatever the
bacula scripts create by defaults.
In regards to tuning, I did play with changing the join and sort buffer
sizes. I found a 'slight' increase in performance. By
Stephen, do you use bat or bconsole? Perhaps the issue os on bat console...
El 13 de abr de 2010, 7:37 p.m., Thomas Mueller tho...@chaschperli.ch
escribió:
Am Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:59:25 +0200 schrieb Koldo Santisteban:
thanks for your answer. The first stage was with mysql 5.0.77, and works
Hello Stephan,
Thanks for your feeback, sometime, few users have performance problem due to
bad
settings and can give bad advise or the impression that nothing can be done
whereas it works well
on ten of thousand of silent users.
In this case the performance problem is due to the presence of
Hello
I am working with bacula 5.0.1. On first stage i setup the server with
bacula 5.0.1 and Mysql, but, when i need to restore i have found that the
bulid tree process take 10-12 hours (or more). I have read all about this
issues and i can see that no exists any magic solution. In order to solve
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Koldo Santisteban wrote:
Hello
I am working with bacula 5.0.1. On first stage i setup the server with
bacula 5.0.1 and Mysql, but, when i need to restore i have found that the
bulid tree process take 10-12 hours (or more). I have read all about this
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:03:39PM +0100, Graham Keeling wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Koldo Santisteban wrote:
Hello
I am working with bacula 5.0.1. On first stage i setup the server with
bacula 5.0.1 and Mysql, but, when i need to restore i have found that the
bulid
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Koldo Santisteban wrote:
Hello
I am working with bacula 5.0.1. On first stage i setup the server with
bacula 5.0.1 and Mysql, but, when i need to restore i have found that the
bulid tree process take 10-12 hours (or more). I have read all about this
I am working with bacula 5.0.1. On first stage i setup the server with
bacula 5.0.1 and Mysql, but, when i need to restore i have found that the
bulid tree process take 10-12 hours (or more). I have read all about this
issues and i can see that no exists any magic solution. In order to solve
thanks for your answer.
The first stage was with mysql 5.0.77, and works with bacula 3.0.3 without
problems. I have used the same database and server with bacula 5.0.1. The
bacula server + DB is a 3,5 Gb Ram with a Xeon processor.
I have tested my environment installing postgree on the same
14 matches
Mail list logo
