In response to Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not
> go into the details) needs to have all files from that
> workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on
> tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked
> such
I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not
go into the details) needs to have all files from that
workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on
tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked
such that the bacula-fd.conf can contain a passphrase fo
I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not
go into the details) needs to have all files from that
workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on
tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked
such that the bacula-fd.conf can contain a passphrase fo
On Monday 14 August 2006 17:16, Ryan Novosielski wrote:
> But the release WAS 1.36 -- there was no 1.37. So... has the process
> changed here, or is the original post incorrect?
Bacula versions n.even.xx (e.g. 1.36.1 or 1.38.11) are production releases.
Versions n.odd.xx (e.g. 1.37.5 or 1.39.18)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
But the release WAS 1.36 -- there was no 1.37. So... has the process
changed here, or is the original post incorrect?
_ _ _ _ ___ _ _ _
|Y#| | | |\/| | \ |\ | | |Ryan Novosielski - Systems Programmer III
|$&| |__| | | |__/ | \| _| |[EM
> This is not the case. We don't release like that. What we have
> recently released is 1.39-beta. Eventually, there will be a full
> 1.39 release.
>
> --
Sorry, It's been a long enough time with 1.38 that I forgot of the
previous release was 1.37 or 1.36.
John
On 12 Aug 2006 at 4:19, John Drescher wrote:
> > Wonderful. Any estimate on the release of 1.39?
When it's ready. Weeks or months, not days.
> The source has already been released. Since this is a odd number I
> believe all 1.39 releases will be beta only and you will have to wait
> for 1.40 f
> Wonderful. Any estimate on the release of 1.39?
>
> Mike
The source has already been released. Since this is a odd number I
believe all 1.39 releases will be beta only and you will have to wait
for 1.40 for an official release.
John
-
On Fri, 11 Aug 2006, Landon Fuller might have said:
> This functionality is available in the 1.39 betas; I have some
> documentation on my web site:
> http://landonf.bikemonkey.org/code/bacula/
> Configuring_Bacula_Encryption.20060305184424.26351.sandbox.html
>
> The encryption is implem
On Aug 11, 2006, at 13:24, Mike wrote:
I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not
go into the details) needs to have all files from that
workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on
tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked
such that the
I have a possible situation at work where one user (I'll not
go into the details) needs to have all files from that
workstation encrypted before they get on the network and on
tape. Has there been a discussion, plan, or option I've overlooked
such that the bacula-fd.conf can contain a passphrase fo
11 matches
Mail list logo
