Re: [Bacula-users] git status - for regression testing

[Phil Stracchino]

On 10/01/15 10:27, Ana Emília M. Arruda wrote:
> The git clone command for bacula repository:
> 
> git clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula localfolder
> 
> If you want to clone a specific branch (the clone without specifying the
> branch will be for the origin/Branch-7.0):
> 
> git clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula --branch Branch-7.2 localfolder
> 
> Best regards,
> Ana


Thanks, Ana.

-- 
  Phil Stracchino
  Babylon Communications
  ph...@caerllewys.net
  p...@co.ordinate.org
  Landline: 603.293.8485

--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] git status - for regression testing

[Dan Langille]

> On Oct 1, 2015, at 3:47 PM, Kern Sibbald  wrote:
> 
> Hello Dan,
> 
> The tests will not work for your nodes that are reporting a difference in 
> commits.  This difference is probably because at one point in the past I 
> rewrote the git history slightly to remove some unwanted commits.
> 
> There are two ways to correct the problem on those nodes:
> 
> 1. Rewind the repo and repull it with the following commands:
> 
>cd 
>git checkout Branch-xxx
>git reset --hard 1ef84681d13d0c35
>git pull
> 
> This should work on any branch ...
> 
> 2. Delete the repo and reclone it.
> 
>  I have tested #1, but my Internet connection is via satellite and is so 
> terribly slow that I cannot lookup the exact command for cloning the database.
> 
> Best regards,
> Kern
> 
> 
> On 15-10-01 05:28 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>> I am running regression testing on both Bacula 7 and Bacula 5. Both are 
>> still in heavy use so regression testing is still important.
>> 
>> My Bacula 7 tree seems ok, and all nodes report:
>> 
>> $ git status
>> On branch Branch-7.2
>> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-7.2'.
>> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>> 
>> 
>> My 5.x source trees are not consistent.  Most nodes report:
>> 
>> $ git status
>> On branch Branch-5.2
>> Your branch is ahead of 'origin/Branch-5.2' by 1354 commits.
>>   (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
>> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>> 
>> 
>> A few nodes report
>> 
>> $ git status
>> On branch Branch-5.2
>> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-5.2'.
>> nothing to commit, working directory clean


All nodes now report:

$ git status
On branch Branch-5.2
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-5.2'.
nothing to commit, working directory clean


Thank you.

—
Dan Langille
http://langille .org/







signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] git status - for regression testing

[Ana Emília M . Arruda]

Hello Kern and Dan,

The git clone command for bacula repository:

git clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula localfolder

If you want to clone a specific branch (the clone without specifying the
branch will be for the origin/Branch-7.0):

git clone http://git.bacula.org/bacula --branch Branch-7.2 localfolder

Best regards,
Ana

On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Kern Sibbald  wrote:

> Hello Dan,
>
> The tests will not work for your nodes that are reporting a difference in
> commits.  This difference is probably because at one point in the past I
> rewrote the git history slightly to remove some unwanted commits.
>
> There are two ways to correct the problem on those nodes:
>
> 1. Rewind the repo and repull it with the following commands:
>
>cd 
>git checkout Branch-xxx
>git reset --hard 1ef84681d13d0c35
>git pull
>
> This should work on any branch ...
>
> 2. Delete the repo and reclone it.
>
>  I have tested #1, but my Internet connection is via satellite and is so
> terribly slow that I cannot lookup the exact command for cloning the
> database.
>
> Best regards,
> Kern
>
>
>
> On 15-10-01 05:28 AM, Dan Langille wrote:
>
> I am running regression testing on both Bacula 7 and Bacula 5. Both are still 
> in heavy use so regression testing is still important.
>
> My Bacula 7 tree seems ok, and all nodes report:
>
> $ git status
> On branch Branch-7.2
> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-7.2'.
> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>
>
> My 5.x source trees are not consistent.  Most nodes report:
>
> $ git status
> On branch Branch-5.2
> Your branch is ahead of 'origin/Branch-5.2' by 1354 commits.
>   (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>
>
> A few nodes report
>
> $ git status
> On branch Branch-5.2
> Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-5.2'.
> nothing to commit, working directory clean
>
> Should I change something to ensure consistency across regression tests?
>
> —
> Dan Langillehttp://langille.org/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
>
>
>
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing 
> listBacula-users@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> ___
> Bacula-users mailing list
> Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
>
>
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

Re: [Bacula-users] git status - for regression testing

[Kern Sibbald]

Hello Dan,

The tests will not work for your nodes that are reporting a difference 
in commits.  This difference is probably because at one point in the 
past I rewrote the git history slightly to remove some unwanted commits.


There are two ways to correct the problem on those nodes:

1. Rewind the repo and repull it with the following commands:

   cd 
   git checkout Branch-xxx
   git reset --hard 1ef84681d13d0c35
   git pull

This should work on any branch ...

2. Delete the repo and reclone it.

 I have tested #1, but my Internet connection is via satellite and is 
so terribly slow that I cannot lookup the exact command for cloning the 
database.


Best regards,
Kern


On 15-10-01 05:28 AM, Dan Langille wrote:

I am running regression testing on both Bacula 7 and Bacula 5. Both are still 
in heavy use so regression testing is still important.

My Bacula 7 tree seems ok, and all nodes report:

$ git status
On branch Branch-7.2
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-7.2'.
nothing to commit, working directory clean


My 5.x source trees are not consistent.  Most nodes report:

$ git status
On branch Branch-5.2
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/Branch-5.2' by 1354 commits.
   (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
nothing to commit, working directory clean


A few nodes report

$ git status
On branch Branch-5.2
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-5.2'.
nothing to commit, working directory clean

Should I change something to ensure consistency across regression tests?

—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/







--


___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users


--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users

[Bacula-users] git status - for regression testing

[Dan Langille]

I am running regression testing on both Bacula 7 and Bacula 5. Both are still 
in heavy use so regression testing is still important.

My Bacula 7 tree seems ok, and all nodes report:

$ git status
On branch Branch-7.2
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-7.2'.
nothing to commit, working directory clean


My 5.x source trees are not consistent.  Most nodes report:

$ git status
On branch Branch-5.2
Your branch is ahead of 'origin/Branch-5.2' by 1354 commits.
  (use "git push" to publish your local commits)
nothing to commit, working directory clean


A few nodes report

$ git status
On branch Branch-5.2
Your branch is up-to-date with 'origin/Branch-5.2'.
nothing to commit, working directory clean

Should I change something to ensure consistency across regression tests?

—
Dan Langille
http://langille.org/







signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users