Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

Innobackupex is excellent- we use it- but it's not as trivial as a tar copy of the mysql directory (shut the database down first). For example, you may end up using the database username/password on the command line in your scripts (which you should probably avoid). Also, according to the man

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Raymond Burns Jr. wrote: > I didn't run a backup of the database because of all the great responses > from people. ​Oh dear Lord man! If running mysql, shut the database down and tar up the​ /var/lib/mysql directory (or whatever you have in

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 09:01:29AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > > > I run daily backups of my database and had finished my monthly full run > for September, so I was technically covered. However I was not looking > forward to restoring a 900+Gb mysql database from a text dump which on

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

Good luck. Kern On 15-09-25 12:02 PM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > So far so good. Minor snafu on my part when updating database, but I'm > running 7.2 now. Looking good so far. Will find out more when hundreds > of jobs run tonight. > > Stephen > > > > On 09/24/2015 08:40 AM, Stephen Thompson

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

Help? Well, the compile and install went fine, but the update tables script is having issue. I was running 7.0.5 before. Not sure what database version, but likely whatever was appropriate to 7.0.5. First time I ran script as su'ed user which caused this... -- Altering mysql tables

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

I run daily backups of my database and had finished my monthly full run for September, so I was technically covered. However I was not looking forward to restoring a 900+Gb mysql database from a text dump which on my system would take days, if not an entire week. The last time I had to

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

Spoke too soon, I see what's going on, I was running update script from new location (7.2.0) and it's referencing old location (7.0.5) and running the wrong mysql script. On 09/25/2015 08:34 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > Help? > > Well, the compile and install went fine, but the update

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

Did you run a backup of the database? If not, I bet you were terrified with all the errors :) Same thing happened to me going to 7.0.5, and it sent me for a frenzy. I didn't run a backup of the database because of all the great responses from people. When is the 7.2.0 rpm expected? Not running

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

So far so good. Minor snafu on my part when updating database, but I'm running 7.2 now. Looking good so far. Will find out more when hundreds of jobs run tonight. Stephen On 09/24/2015 08:40 AM, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > All, > > I typically patch bacula pretty frequently, but I saw

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

Thanks, I'll be upgrading soon. What known bugs are in the update_bacula_tables scripts? thanks, Stephen On 9/24/15 10:51 PM, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: > On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:40:05AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I typically patch bacula pretty frequently, but I saw the

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 06:43:57AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > Thanks, I'll be upgrading soon. > > What known bugs are in the update_bacula_tables scripts? > > thanks, > Stephen > Hi Stephen, not real "bugs", but rather some weird messages about the EOT tag not being found and other

[Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

All, I typically patch bacula pretty frequently, but I saw the somewhat unusual notice on the latest release notes that warns it may not be ready for use in production. How stable is it? I don't really have the resources to test this out, but rather would have to go straight to production

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

Hello, We put a caution message in every release, particularly for new features which are generally tested but not always tested in production. Normally most of the issues turn up for non-Linux distributions where we either have not tested or have tested less than Linux. Version 7.2.0 is as

Re: [Bacula-users] is 7.2 ready for prime time?

On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 08:40:05AM -0700, Stephen Thompson wrote: > > All, > > I typically patch bacula pretty frequently, but I saw the somewhat > unusual notice on the latest release notes that warns it may not be > ready for use in production. How stable is it? I don't really have the >