Re: [Bacula-users] mystifying restore problem w/ bacula-fd for, windows 3.0.1 .. invisible directories created

2009-07-02 Thread Bob Hetzel
I doubt that it's a corrupted file system, it's merely hidden directories. If you go into windows explorer and change the settings so it shows you Hidden, System, Operating System, etc files you should now be able to see those dirs from windows explorer. I don't think that will affect the

[Bacula-users] mystifying restore problem w/ bacula-fd for windows 3.0.1 .. invisible directories created

2009-07-02 Thread Jeff Dickens
Apparently I need to do much more comprehensive restore testing, because when I need, it my bacula installation has fallen down around me. This is just the worst of several problems I will be reporting. First, I ran a restore. The original client is a now-dead XP box, the target client is a

Re: [Bacula-users] mystifying restore problem w/ bacula-fd for, windows 3.0.1 .. invisible directories created

2009-07-02 Thread Jeff Dickens
Indeed they were marked as system files. I have no idea how they got that way. I did two restores, one from a full, and one from a differential, and the one from the full always came up marked as a System file. I repeated it three times, almost running out the disk before I caught on.

Re: [Bacula-users] mystifying restore problem w/ bacula-fd for, windows 3.0.1 .. invisible directories created

2009-07-02 Thread Jeff Dickens
It's not expected because the behavior is demonstrably different with a different version of the fd. I will be reproducing in excruciating detail. Whether it's ever looked at is not up to me. Bob Hetzel wrote: While I can't comment on differential backups as I've never found a use for