Re: [Bacula-users] new RPMs for 1.38.11
Hi Felix, I got a bit confused with your email. Does this mean from now on you will release the rpm packages of bacula? Thanks Jaime, Felix Schwarz wrote: Hi all, my build infrastructure is in place now, so I released new RPMs for FC5 (x86_64), FC6 (i386 and x86_64) and CentOS/RHEL 4.4 (x86_64). You can find them in the package rpms-contrib-fschwarz. All RPMs are signed by my new RPM signing key (ID: 0xFAF24CCA). The rpmkey package contains a RPM which includes this key. [RPM release tag 4] Please note that bacula 1.38.11 did not compile on FC6 out of the box. I had to backport some changes from 1.39.22 (console.c, name clash tee with a library). This problem does not occur in earlier releases (FC4, EL4). The RPMs named bacula-1.38.11-4.* use this patch. In all other aspects they are identical to their bacula-1.38.11-3.* counterparts. I think the patch is correct, but no core developer reviewed it yet. [testing] The packages are mostly untested. They are working on my setups. Use at your own risk etc. [old Fedora releases] I will continue building packages for old releases of Fedora as long Redhat provides official security fixes for these releases (no, I don't consider Fedora Legacy as a source for reliable updates). [RHEL releases] The el4 packages were built on CentOS. Hopefully, they can be used on RHEL, too but no guarantees... Additionally, please don't expect the RHEL packages to be maintained as long as the rest of RHEL (seven years). I will only rebuild the rpm source packages released by Scott. No efforts will be done to backport security fixes from newer Bacula versions etc. wxConsole is not present in the RHEL packages as there are no wxGtk packages 2.4 and Bacula needs 2.6. Have fun Felix - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
Re: [Bacula-users] new RPMs for 1.38.11
Jaime Ventura wrote: I got a bit confused with your email. Does this mean from now on you will release the rpm packages of bacula? Scott is the official RPM packager. He writes the bacula.spec file which controls the RPM creation. Besides Scott, there are some package building monkeys which compile bacula on several platforms. I do this for Fedora Core 5 (i386, x86_64), Fedora Core 6 (i386, x86_64) and RHEL/CentOS (i386, x86_64). These RPMs will be provided in the rpm-contrib-* section. fs - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
[Bacula-users] new RPMs for 1.38.11
Hi all, my build infrastructure is in place now, so I released new RPMs for FC5 (x86_64), FC6 (i386 and x86_64) and CentOS/RHEL 4.4 (x86_64). You can find them in the package rpms-contrib-fschwarz. All RPMs are signed by my new RPM signing key (ID: 0xFAF24CCA). The rpmkey package contains a RPM which includes this key. [RPM release tag 4] Please note that bacula 1.38.11 did not compile on FC6 out of the box. I had to backport some changes from 1.39.22 (console.c, name clash tee with a library). This problem does not occur in earlier releases (FC4, EL4). The RPMs named bacula-1.38.11-4.* use this patch. In all other aspects they are identical to their bacula-1.38.11-3.* counterparts. I think the patch is correct, but no core developer reviewed it yet. [testing] The packages are mostly untested. They are working on my setups. Use at your own risk etc. [old Fedora releases] I will continue building packages for old releases of Fedora as long Redhat provides official security fixes for these releases (no, I don't consider Fedora Legacy as a source for reliable updates). [RHEL releases] The el4 packages were built on CentOS. Hopefully, they can be used on RHEL, too but no guarantees... Additionally, please don't expect the RHEL packages to be maintained as long as the rest of RHEL (seven years). I will only rebuild the rpm source packages released by Scott. No efforts will be done to backport security fixes from newer Bacula versions etc. wxConsole is not present in the RHEL packages as there are no wxGtk packages 2.4 and Bacula needs 2.6. Have fun Felix - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.phpp=sourceforgeCID=DEVDEV ___ Bacula-users mailing list Bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/bacula-users
