Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-21 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bruno Friedmann wrote: > Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 21 Aug 2007 at 12:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote: Dan Langille wrote: > On 20 Aug 2007 at 0:40, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 18 A

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-21 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Langille wrote: > On 21 Aug 2007 at 12:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 20 Aug 2007 at 0:40, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >>> Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Dan La

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-21 Thread Dan Langille
On 21 Aug 2007 at 12:47, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > On 20 Aug 2007 at 0:40, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > > > >> Dan Langille wrote: > >>> On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >>> > Dan Langille wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote:

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-21 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Langille wrote: > On 20 Aug 2007 at 0:40, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >>> Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >> Since

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-21 Thread Bruno Friedmann
Frank Sweetser wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > >> On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >> >> >>> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail:

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-20 Thread Attila Fülöp
Dan Langille wrote: . >> >> Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2007 23:57:00 + (%z) >> >> ...that don't look right to me. :) I suspect %z and %Z may not be >> handled properly on non-Linux? Is that even possible? I thought most of >> this stuff kinda stuck to POSIX for this kind of thing, whatever

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-20 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Langille wrote: > On 20 Aug 2007 at 0:40, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: >>> Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >> Since

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-20 Thread Dan Langille
On 20 Aug 2007 at 0:40, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > > > >> Dan Langille wrote: > >>> On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >>> > Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: > >>

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-19 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: Date: Sat, 18 A

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-18 Thread Frank Sweetser
Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > >> Dan Langille wrote: >>> On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >>> Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) For the

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-18 Thread Dan Langille
On 18 Aug 2007 at 11:00, Ryan Novosielski wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > > > >> Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: > >> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) > >> > >> For the recipient the above mes

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-18 Thread Ryan Novosielski
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dan Langille wrote: > On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > >> Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: >> Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) >> >> For the recipient the above message appears to h

Re: [Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-17 Thread Dan Langille
On 18 Aug 2007 at 2:00, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: > Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: > Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) > > For the recipient the above message appears to have been receieved at > 03:48, two hours ahead. > > The correct timezone

[Bacula-users] wrong date in mail report with 2.2.0

2007-08-17 Thread Per olof Ljungmark
Since upgrading to 2.2.0 bsmtp sets the wrong Date: header in the mail: Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2007 01:48:56 + (CEST) For the recipient the above message appears to have been receieved at 03:48, two hours ahead. The correct timezone is UTC +2, the above header should have read Date: Sat, 18 Aug 2