Arno Lehmann schrieb:
Given the number of files backed up, the second job is probably an
incremental backup.
To compare backup speeds, run full backups only.
Yes, I did a full backup on both machines.
On server #2 Bacula should backup the daily snapshots of the Vmware
images. Image-filesize
and it still happens with 2.4.4.
this line is all i found in the log about JobId 61211:
12-Jan 23:47:33 backup-dir JobId 61211: Fatal error: Max run time exceeded. Job
canceled.
i have five jobs running at the same time/with the same priority and with Max
RunTime= 20mins
four of them starts
Sorry this seems stupid but when I enter in a restore
I use the choice 3 ( list of jobids )
get my / rebuild
If I issue a find *.bak it find and list all what I want to mark and restore
(recurse also)
but giving a
mark *.bak give 0 file marked
help say mark dir/file to be restored
Thank you for your responses.
Somehow I get the feeling that excluding a single file's contents is
way easier than risking a failed restore. Since I don't mind the few
MBs in /dev (except the hunderts of MBs in /dev/tty12) I'll submit a
feature request regarding this issue. Who knows - it
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Stefan Sorin Nicolin
r...@nicolinux.org wrote:
Thank you for your responses.
Somehow I get the feeling that excluding a single file's contents is way
easier than risking a failed restore. Since I don't mind the few MBs in /dev
(except the hunderts of MBs in
dd test has been run...
Just before the last run, I switched off the compression on the tape...
r...@backup:~# date; dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/nst0 bs=1024k count=10240; date
Mon Jan 12 20:50:35 CET 2009
10240+0 records in
10240+0 records out
10737418240 bytes (11 GB) copied, 88.6869 s,
On 13.01.2009, at 13:48, John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 7:22 AM, Stefan Sorin Nicolin
r...@nicolinux.org wrote:
Thank you for your responses.
Somehow I get the feeling that excluding a single file's contents
is way
easier than risking a failed restore. Since I don't mind
What I ment was excluding the _contents_ of a file. I want to keep
everything else (filname, permissions and so on).
Just exclude that file totally. I guarantee gentoo will not care as I
have booted many times in gentoo using my home made live cds without
/dev/tty12
John
And also /dev/tty12 on my system is not a large file just a device node.
jmd0 john # ls -al /dev/tty12 -al
crw--- 1 root root 4, 12 Jan 13 08:09 /dev/tty12
One more comment about this.
Do you have console output when you hit ctrl-alt-f12
if you do not I see the problem. The problem is
Hi,
when manually recycling a (used) volume with
update volume=xxx VolStatus=Recycle
this volume will be accepted for overwriting. Nonetheless, Jobs that have been
written to that volume will NOT be removed from the catalog. This results in
invalid data, as the catalog will still contain data
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 8:08 AM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote:
What I ment was excluding the _contents_ of a file. I want to keep
everything else (filname, permissions and so on).
Just exclude that file totally. I guarantee gentoo will not care as I
have booted many times in
Hi,
I'm running bacula 2.4.4 on FreeBSD 7.1 with HP DAT160
drive connected to USB.
Problem is that when I restore, a lot of files are
missing and restore warns about file count mismatch.
My device configuration is like this:
Device {
Name = TAPE
Description = DAT160 Tape
Media Type =
Hello Bastian,
Le Tuesday 13 January 2009 14:27:49 Bastian Friedrich, vous avez écrit :
when manually recycling a (used) volume with
update volume=xxx VolStatus=Recycle
this volume will be accepted for overwriting. Nonetheless, Jobs that have
been written to that volume will NOT be removed
Thanks for the pointer.
I see this behavior an 20+ virtualized Gentoo installations (XEN
domains). I'll chech it.
Stefan
On 13.01.2009, at 14:26, John Drescher wrote:
And also /dev/tty12 on my system is not a large file just a device
node.
jmd0 john # ls -al /dev/tty12 -al
crw--- 1
Hello All,
We are using Bacula to take the backups onto the Tape Library Fujitsu
FibreCAT Tx48 Library. The bacula version we are using is 2.2.7.
Problem is we get very slow backup speed , around 50 GB per hour
whereas in ideal scenario the above mentioned tape library gives 288 GB
/ Hour
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Stefan Sorin Nicolin
bac...@nicolinux.org wrote:
Thanks for the pointer.
I see this behavior an 20+ virtualized Gentoo installations (XEN domains).
I'll chech it.
Oh. In the visualized guests you should disable the output to the
console instead. I had to do
We are using Bacula to take the backups onto the Tape Library Fujitsu
FibreCAT Tx48 Library. The bacula version we are using is 2.2.7.
That is a old version. You will get better performance with the current release.
Problem is we get very slow backup speed , around 50 GB per hour whereas in
Group,
You know when you see the message Please mount Volume Weekly-0007 or label a
new one for: _and_ you do label a new tape that it should then start being
written to, mine doesn't.
Can I run a SQL statement to manually insert the labeled tape into the catalog?
If so, what is the correct
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
Pascal
On Tuesday 13 January 2009 15:00:58 Eric Bollengier wrote:
Hello Bastian,
Le Tuesday 13 January 2009 14:27:49 Bastian Friedrich, vous avez écrit :
when manually recycling a (used) volume with
update volume=xxx VolStatus=Recycle
this volume will be accepted for overwriting. Nonetheless,
You know when you see the message Please mount Volume Weekly-0007 or label
a new one for: _and_ you do label a new tape that it should then start being
written to, mine doesn't.
Did you try to label a tape at this point?
Can I run a SQL statement to manually insert the labeled tape into
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Pascal Clermont
pascal-l...@lexum.umontreal.ca wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
Easiest way (before knowing what you mean with last job) might be
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
Timo Neuvonen wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a new one in the library.
Easiest way (before knowing what you mean with
I Have several jobs executed during the night (~20) and with my
comprehension of this value, every job during the same night would be
spawned to different tapes. This is most useful when the Media is a file
and you want a new file for each backup that is done. -bacula documentation
Then use
John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:41 AM, Pascal Clermont
pascal-l...@lexum.umontreal.ca wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead
Here's the specifics of my bacula installation
gyrus-dir Version: 2.4.3 (10 October 2008) i686-pc-linux-gnu suse 10.2
Daemon started 08-Jan-09 19:31, 799 Jobs run since started.
Heap: heap=1,871,872 smbytes=632,680 max_bytes=2,934,571 bufs=5,050
max_bufs=10,223
I recently ran a restore job
John Drescher wrote:
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 10:57 AM, Timo Neuvonen timo-n...@tee-en.net wrote:
Is it possible to have bacula close a tape once last job is run
(backupcatalog in my case)?
currently it leaves tapes on a APPEND status, then bacula wants to
reuse the tape instead of taking a
John,
Yep, I tried labeling a couple of tapes and mounted them but no joy. I guess
I'll have to bring the tapes back in-house to make the backups easy.
FWIW, I'm running Bacula 2.4.2 on this machine.
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
David Gardner
email:
this is what I use, but on the next bacula run, bacula kept wanting to
load the tape prior to take into consideration that the tape was past
the expiration time of usage.
The big issue is the fact that the tape is no longer in the library
since it is gone for safe keeping. So bacula finishes
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 11:09 AM, Andriy Bandos anb...@pitt.edu wrote:
Sorry, did not get that.
No problem. I know this is difficult to explain. Probably my fault here.
Here is the specific example I asked about:
user=30, md=5, case=6, reading=0;
There are two abnormalities (calc + mass) and
Is this really supposed to be on the bacula list?
No way. I am not sure how I redirected it there. My fault for trying
to answer my emails 5 minutes before a conference call. To my defense
there were several bacula emails just before this one but I must be
more careful..
Sounds like Radiation
Bruno Friedmann wrote:
Sorry this seems stupid but when I enter in a restore
I use the choice 3 ( list of jobids )
get my / rebuild
If I issue a find *.bak it find and list all what I want to mark and restore
(recurse also)
but giving a
mark *.bak give 0 file marked
help say mark
John Drescher wrote:
this is what I use, but on the next bacula run, bacula kept wanting to
load the tape prior to take into consideration that the tape was past
the expiration time of usage.
The big issue is the fact that the tape is no longer in the library
since it is gone for safe
If I remove the tape, and do a update slots scan or update slots in
bconsole, the media is still flagged inchanger 1. this is an issue
aswell, but I can live with that, since tapes are back in the library
prior to the Volume Retention.
Are you using bacula 2.4.X and not some ancient version
John Drescher wrote:
If I remove the tape, and do a update slots scan or update slots in
bconsole, the media is still flagged inchanger 1. this is an issue
aswell, but I can live with that, since tapes are back in the library
prior to the Volume Retention.
Are you using bacula 2.4.X and not
Hello,
I have a working bacula setup with several machines running bacula-fd. The
director and SD are running on the same machine and writing to a tape
changer. Full backups are working great, and some incremental are working
just fine.
However, when I run and incremental backup for some
Bastian Friedrich wrote:
Would you regard that as a bug? Or is it a PEBKAC, as I should not use the
update command to recycle volumes? Or ist it just wait for these jobs to
expire via their retention period? Any recommendations on how to handle
these cases?
What the other guys said.
Hello
Why I see in my bconsole so much waiting on max Storage jobs ?
Here my status dir :
6534 Differe redeyemadrid.irontec.vpn.2009-01-11_19.00.42 is running
6625 Increme pbximh.irontec.vpn.2009-01-13_20.30.18 is running
6628 Increme pbxalhondiga.irontec.vpn.2009-01-13_21.00.22 is
Hello,
I have a working bacula setup with several machines
running bacula-fd. The director and SD are running on the
same machine and writing to a tape changer. Full backups
are working great, and some incremental are working just
fine.
However, when I run and incremental backup for
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Mikel Jimenez Fernandez
mi...@irontec.com wrote:
Hello
Why I see in my bconsole so much waiting on max Storage jobs ?
Here my status dir :
6534 Differe redeyemadrid.irontec.vpn.2009-01-11_19.00.42 is running
6625 Increme
Frank Altpeter wrote:
Hi list,
does anyone reproduce this difference within the status director output:
With 2.4.3:
Terminated Jobs:
JobId LevelFiles Bytes Status FinishedName
224 Incr
43 matches
Mail list logo