[Bacula-users] 2.4.4 brings up problems with automatic volume recycling

2009-01-27 Thread Andreas Unterkircher
Hello, We were using the 2.4.3 version of Bacula on Debian Etch for a long time and two days ago upgraded to the 2.4.4 version. Since then we encountered now the second day a problem with the automatic volume recycling. We use a backup to disk and have defined a pool as following so that every

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Allan Black
Jason Dixon wrote: a Packet size too big error. The Director resides on a global zone in Solaris x86. I've managed to capture a truss during one of the failures: http://mirrors.omniti.com/bacula/bacula.truss Very strange. Everything seems to be going normally: 14106/1:

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Allan Black
Hi, Jason, Just found this on SunSolve: Solution Type Sun Alert Solution 201321 : Solaris 10 Systems With Certain Patches Installed May Experience Data Integrity Issues Over TCP Loopback 1. Impact Solaris 10 systems installed without patch 127111-03 or later

[Bacula-users] Warning: VSS was not initialized properly. VSS support is disabled.

2009-01-27 Thread KNOPS Manfred
Hello, I installed the bacula win32 version on a Windows Vista 64bit pc. I enabled VSS in the job definition. But I got the error message after every job. So I checked the services Microsoft Software Shadow, Copy Provider and Volume Shadow Copy. Both services are started. Then I

Re: [Bacula-users] [Bacula-devel] bacula hang issue. was: bacula sometimes gets stuck when volume wanted is already in a different drive

2009-01-27 Thread Silver Salonen
Hi. So you're saying there was nothing wrong with bacula-sd behaviour? Or you're saying that I've misconfigured bacula-sd somehow (eg. too many devices or smth), so that bacula-sd's behaviour in this case was OK? Because to my mind I'm not asking for support, but rather notifying developers

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:36:05AM +, Allan Black wrote: Hi, Jason, Just found this on SunSolve: Solution Type Sun Alert Solution 201321 : Solaris 10 Systems With Certain Patches Installed May Experience Data Integrity Issues Over TCP Loopback I

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:37:36PM -0500, Jason Dixon wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:36:05AM +, Allan Black wrote: Hi, Jason, Just found this on SunSolve: Solution Type Sun Alert Solution 201321 : Solaris 10 Systems With Certain Patches Installed May

[Bacula-users] Windows bare metal backup/restore

2009-01-27 Thread Martin Spinassi
Hi list! I know it should be an answered question, but googling it didn't clarify much, so I decided to ask you: how are your experiences about abre metal backup/restore to windows servers? I've seen some suggestions around the web, but they look pretty estrange, doing disk images before coping

Re: [Bacula-users] Solaris Packet size too big failures

2009-01-27 Thread Jason Dixon
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:12:03AM +, Allan Black wrote: Jason Dixon wrote: a Packet size too big error. The Director resides on a global zone in Solaris x86. I've managed to capture a truss during one of the failures: http://mirrors.omniti.com/bacula/bacula.truss ... [This is

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.4.4 brings up problems with automatic volume recycling

2009-01-27 Thread Christian Balzer
Hello, On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:18:11 +0100 Andreas Unterkircher wrote: We were using the 2.4.3 version of Bacula on Debian Etch for a long time and two days ago upgraded to the 2.4.4 version. Since then we encountered now the second day a problem with the automatic volume recycling. We

[Bacula-users] bugs?

2009-01-27 Thread Basura
hey guys i think i've identified 2 bugs but i wanted to see if anyone else could reproduce them before i submit them i'm using ubuntu and bacula 2.4.2 1) manual modification when running a job is not honored: Run Backup job JobName: Big hilikus-pc Backup Level:Incremental Client:

Re: [Bacula-users] bugs?

2009-01-27 Thread John Drescher
DVD backup using bacula has several known bugs. Unless someone submits patches it may be removed from a future version. John -- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SourcForge Community SourceForge wants to tell your

Re: [Bacula-users] bugs?

2009-01-27 Thread John Drescher
On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:56 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: DVD backup using bacula has several known bugs. Unless someone submits patches it may be removed from a future version. I should probably add or a maintainer for the dvd code is found. Search the archives this is

Re: [Bacula-users] Warning: VSS was not initialized properly. VSS support is disabled.

2009-01-27 Thread Matthew Rhoten
KNOPS Manfred wrote: I enabled VSS in the job definition. But I got the error message after every job. There was some discussion about the 64-bit version of the FD, on bacula-dev a few months back. There are two approaches people are trying. One approach is to make a 64-bit build (using a

Re: [Bacula-users] 2.4.4 brings up problems with automatic volume recycling

2009-01-27 Thread Andreas Unterkircher
Hello Christian, So in the end I caved in and have all diffs and incs go to a single volume with a Volume Use Duration = 23 hours in the pool definition. Thanks for that hint! I will give it a try to see if it solves this problem. Especially that suddenly all jobs shine up in the status

Re: [Bacula-users] bugs?

2009-01-27 Thread Basura
none of those bugs are specific to dvds the mod bug happens even from File to File and the max part size bug is actually working well on DVDs and NOT on File backups Alejandro John Drescher wrote: On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:56 PM, John Drescher dresche...@gmail.com wrote: DVD backup