Re: [Bacula-users] bacula bandwith usage

2011-03-11 Thread Laurent HENRY
Le Wednesday 09 March 2011 16:28:52, vous avez écrit : > > I tried to enable spooling (500 Gb spool) for the tape backup. The perf > > were worse. > > BTW, I use 5GB spool. > > I assume then you do not run concurrent jobs? For a single job the > time will be longer because bacula does not concurren

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula bandwith usage

2011-03-11 Thread Marcello Romani
Il 11/03/2011 10:48, Laurent HENRY ha scritto: > Le Wednesday 09 March 2011 16:28:52, vous avez écrit : >>> I tried to enable spooling (500 Gb spool) for the tape backup. The perf >>> were worse. >> >> BTW, I use 5GB spool. >> >> I assume then you do not run concurrent jobs? For a single job the >>

Re: [Bacula-users] file listing?

2011-03-11 Thread Dan Langille
On 3/9/2011 5:36 PM, ganiuszka wrote: > 2011/3/9 Mike Eggleston: >> Afternoon, >> >> I just noticed one of my clients had a huge incremental (level 2) >> backup. I want to see what file caused the huge increase. I tried 'list >> files jobid=20097' and though I'm shown the files, I'm not shown the

[Bacula-users] VirtualFull multiple tape libraries

2011-03-11 Thread Andreas Ulm
Hi, we've 2 tape libraries (tl) with one media changer for each tl. tl-1 type LTO-4 tl-2 type LTO-5 At the moment we use LTO-4 tapes for both tl. In bacula we've configured them using the following media type setting: tl-1: LTO4 tl-2: LTO5 Our differential and incremental jobs use tl-1 and tl

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula bandwith usage

2011-03-11 Thread John Drescher
>> Attribute spooling makes sense for either though. > > Attribute spooling ? > That enables spooling if the database entries at the end of the job in a batch instead of 1 at a time as the files are being processed. Its quite a bit faster to enable attribute spooling unless you have your database o

[Bacula-users] 3920 Cannot label Volume because it is already labeled:

2011-03-11 Thread dan nguyo
Hi Everyone, Im using bacula 5.2 with 5 USB 500GB disks each for a working day of the week. Now my problem is whenever I try to label a volume I get the error "3920 Cannot label Volume because it is already labeled:". Initially I'd labeled them but due to some issues like waiting for an append-abl

Re: [Bacula-users] 3920 Cannot label Volume because it is already labeled:

2011-03-11 Thread John Drescher
> Im using bacula 5.2 with 5 USB 500GB disks each for a working day of the > week. > Now my problem is whenever I try to label a volume I get the error "3920 > Cannot label Volume because it is already labeled:". > Initially I'd labeled them but due to some issues like waiting for an > append-able

[Bacula-users] Windows 7 client recommendations?

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Eggleston
Morning, I'm trying to backup a user's Windows 7 workstation. Microsoft has switched to the C:/Users directory and left a system, hidden "C:/Documents and Settings" for legacy applications that points to C:/Users. When I backup this box bacula-fd gets into a loop looking for files C:/Documents and

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula restore to Windows 2008 R2

2011-03-11 Thread Bob Hetzel
Joe, This was fixed in 5.0.2 or 5.0.3, I can't recall which, but 5.0.3 is the current windows-fd version. The bug was in the windows bacula-fd.exe so if you're already running your dir/sd at 5.0.x you should be able to upgrade the client to fix it. I don't recall if the problem was created dur

[Bacula-users] bacula-fd on windows 7 not listening on IPv6 address??

2011-03-11 Thread Gavin McCullagh
Hi, I have a Windows 7 computer running the bacula-fd v5.0.3. The computer has an IPv6 address (as does the bacula director and storage daemon. The bacula-fd daemon (according to netstat -na) doesn't appear to be listening on the IPv6 address. This doesn't kill us in that eventually things ti

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Hobbs
On 02/28/2011 11:10 AM, Mike Hobbs wrote: >I'm testing Bacula, so this is not a production setup and I ran into > an issue, problem, bug, I'm not sure. During my testing, I'm backing up > a file system of about 700gb to a disk. A FULL backup took around 21 > hours with compression turned on

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP Backup

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Hendrie
Sorry for the delay. I needed a break. Thank you for your responses. I have DNS working: Bacula server: 10.2.1.98 XP: 10.2.1.97 Is there something special that needs to be setup for the filestore? I am using the same file store for the Bacula server backup as the Windows XP client backup. The B

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread jeffrey Lang
Mike yes, there are options for managing this, they are: Allow Duplicate Jobs = no Cancel Lower Level Duplicates = yes Cancel Queued Duplicates = yes Cancel Running Duplicates = no These are available in the 5.0.X bacula code. jeff Mike Hobbs wrote: On 02/28/20

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread James Woodward
On 2011-03-11, at 9:20 AM, Mike Hobbs wrote: > On 02/28/2011 11:10 AM, Mike Hobbs wrote: >> I'm testing Bacula, so this is not a production setup and I ran into >> an issue, problem, bug, I'm not sure. During my testing, I'm backing up >> a file system of about 700gb to a disk. A FULL backup

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP Backup

2011-03-11 Thread John Drescher
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:49 AM, Mike Hendrie wrote: > Sorry for the delay.  I needed a break. > Thank you for your responses. > > I have DNS working: > Bacula server: 10.2.1.98 > XP: 10.2.1.97 > > Is there something special that needs to be setup for the filestore? I am > using the same file sto

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Hobbs
Jeff and James, thank you guys for your quick replies! This will help me for sure! mike On 03/11/2011 11:52 AM, jeffrey Lang wrote: Mike yes, there are options for managing this, they are: Allow Duplicate Jobs = no Cancel Lower Level Duplicates = yes Cancel Queued

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP Backup

2011-03-11 Thread John Drescher
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Mike Hendrie wrote: > Ubuntu firewall is: inactive > XP firewall is: disabled > > No localhost or 127.0.0.1 settings in the following files: > > bacula-dir.conf > bacula-sd.conf > bacula-fd.conf > > > In the files I am using "bacula" in place of the server DNS: 10

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP Backup

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Hendrie
Ubuntu firewall is: inactive XP firewall is: disabled No localhost or 127.0.0.1 settings in the following files: bacula-dir.conf bacula-sd.conf bacula-fd.conf In the files I am using "bacula" in place of the server DNS: 10.2.1.98 and ""dragon" in place of the DNS:10.2.1.97. There are no, non-co

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Eriksson
On 03/11/2011 08:52 AM, jeffrey Lang wrote: > Mike > > yes, there are options for managing this, they are: > > Allow Duplicate Jobs = no > Cancel Lower Level Duplicates = yes > Cancel Queued Duplicates = yes > Cancel Running Duplicates = no > > These are avail

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 03/11/11 14:03, Thomas Eriksson wrote: > > > On 03/11/2011 08:52 AM, jeffrey Lang wrote: >> Mike >> >> yes, there are options for managing this, they are: >> >> Allow Duplicate Jobs = no >> Cancel Lower Level Duplicates = yes >> Cancel Queued Duplicates = yes >>

Re: [Bacula-users] bacula-fd on windows 7 not listening on IPv6 address??

2011-03-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>The bacula-fd daemon (according to netstat -na) doesn't appear to be >listening on the IPv6 address. Force it to listen on whatever address/port you desire w/ "FDAddresses = " http://www.bacula.org/5.0.x-manuals/en/main/main/Client_File_daemon_Configur.html jlc ---

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread James Woodward
On 2011-03-11, at 12:03 PM, Thomas Eriksson wrote: > > > On 03/11/2011 08:52 AM, jeffrey Lang wrote: >> Mike >> >> yes, there are options for managing this, they are: >> >>Allow Duplicate Jobs = no >>Cancel Lower Level Duplicates = yes >>Cancel Queued Duplicates = yes

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP Backup

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Hendrie
I was not able to get the log to work for the windows client. However, I did get the results attached from the Bacula server. Can you see why is causing the issue? The first half of the file is from the Bacula server being backed up with success. The second half is the windows XP machine failing

Re: [Bacula-users] Repeating FULL backup

2011-03-11 Thread Thomas Eriksson
On 03/11/2011 11:40 AM, Phil Stracchino wrote: > On 03/11/11 14:03, Thomas Eriksson wrote: >> >> >> On 03/11/2011 08:52 AM, jeffrey Lang wrote: >>> Mike >>> >>> yes, there are options for managing this, they are: >>> >>> Allow Duplicate Jobs = no >>> Cancel Lower Level Duplicate

Re: [Bacula-users] file listing?

2011-03-11 Thread ganiuszka
Hi, In my example jobid is putting in: ... File.JobId=8... but this "eight": base64_decode_lstat(8,File.LStat) is exactly eight field (encoded filesize field). I seem that you used standard base64 decoder to decode eighth field. Am I right? Bacula lstat is encoded by using non-standard base64 al

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP Backup

2011-03-11 Thread Mike Hendrie
When using the following command on the XP machine I get an error: C:\Program Files\Bacula>bacula-fd -d 100 C:\Program Files\Bacula> 11-Mar 16:10 bacula-fd: ERROR TERMINATION at /home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/ parse_conf.c:898 Config error: Cannot open config file "C:\Documents and Settings\Al

Re: [Bacula-users] Windows XP Backup

2011-03-11 Thread Joseph L. Casale
>When using the following command on the XP machine I get an error: >  >C:\Program Files\Bacula>bacula-fd -d 100 >C:\Program Files\Bacula> >11-Mar 16:10 bacula-fd: ERROR TERMINATION at >/home/kern/bacula/k/bacula/src/lib/ >parse_conf.c:898 >Config error: Cannot open config file "C:\Documents and S