I have recently started using Bacula and have a couple of questions
regarding volume pools. I am using 7.2 version, and we have 4 Linux
servers with a total of about 100GB of data to backup.
1. We have two different storage devices that are in different
locations (because of bandwidth
Hmm is there any difference in performance between file system types, ext4
and XFS?
hence why I pondered a re-format.
On 2 November 2015 at 14:36, Randy Katz wrote:
> Yes, however, formatting the disk is a bit extreme, you can just go to the
> designated
>
Should each storage daemon/geographic storage location have it's own
set of Volume Pools? Or can I share one set of Volume Pools between
all of the storage daemons/storage locations?
I am using auto labelling as well and it works great.
--
Wesley Render, Consultant
OtherData
On 11/03/15 15:23, Thing wrote:
> Hmm is there any difference in performance between file system types,
> ext4 and XFS?
XFS was developed by SGI as a media system, and its design is optimized
for long streaming reads and writes. Nevertheless, it performs enough
better than ext4 at short random
Hi all,
I want to use VirtualFull as default policy for my backup, but I have some
problem that I'm not able to solve:
- I create a specific pool on a new device (disk), and run the Vfull
the backup goes well, I can find the new volume into his specific
device, but I can't see the Job into
Hi,
for question #2:
Yes you have to create different pool, the firts reason is that usually
incremental bck lives less than a Full backup, the duration is into the
Pool information
So in my case I have
- p-daily INCREMENTAL with 6 volumes (duration 7 days)
- p-weekly DIFFERENTIAL with 4
Thanks Carlo. This is very helpful. I also found this here which I
missed before:
http://www.bacula.org/7.0.x-manuals/en/main/Automated_Disk_Backup.html
--
Wesley Render, Consultant
OtherData
--
Is anyone able to clarify question number 1?
I should be all set after that.
Thanks!
--
Wesley Render, Consultant
OtherData
--
___
Bacula-users mailing list
I don't like to use "label-format" I prefer to set the label by myself.
In my installation all the jobs that runs during the same night gone to the
same volumes.
bye
2015-11-03 17:14 GMT+01:00 Wesley Render :
>
> Thanks Carlo. This is very helpful. I also found this here
On 11/03/15 11:23, Carlo Filippetto wrote:
> I don't like to use "label-format" I prefer to set the label by myself.
> In my installation all the jobs that runs during the same night gone to
> the same volumes.
I use auto-labeling for my disk volumes, to achieve exactly that end.
Each volume
10 matches
Mail list logo