Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-08 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/8/20 7:54 PM, Josip Deanovic wrote: > In case one is using database cluster in round-robin setup, one > of the master nodes could start lagging which could have unpredictable > effects on most applications (unless synchronous communication is > in use). Exactly, which is why this is safe

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-08 Thread Josip Deanovic
On 2020-10-08 15:54, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 10/8/20 9:11 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote: Do you have to turn off attribute spooling with 9.6.3 and 9.6.6? Disabling attribute spooling will inflict noticeable performance degradation. Unfortunately, yes, because the attribute spooling code — at

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-08 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/8/20 9:11 AM, Josip Deanovic wrote: > On 2020-10-08 14:56, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> High availability, fundamentally. I'd honestly prefer to be using >> Percona XtraDB Cluster, but there is no working, maintained ebuild for >> Gentoo Linux — and enterprise customers ARE going to try to use

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-08 Thread Josip Deanovic
On 2020-10-08 14:56, Phil Stracchino wrote: Well, I understand that perspective, but this problem appeared instantly as soon as I upgraded to 9.6.5, with a DB configuration I've been using for years without a hiccup. I could turn the problem on and off like a lightswitch by updating *ONLY* the

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-08 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/8/20 8:45 AM, djosip+n...@linuxpages.net wrote: > On 2020-10-08 14:24, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> >> Well, so far, it's only been a few days, so my conclusions are >> cautious. >> But they are cautiously optimistic. So far, with the Director still >> using HAproxy to round-robin DB

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-08 Thread djosip+news
On 2020-10-08 14:24, Phil Stracchino wrote: Well, so far, it's only been a few days, so my conclusions are cautious. But they are cautiously optimistic. So far, with the Director still using HAproxy to round-robin DB connectins to my MariaDB cluster, I have not seen a single hung job, But

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-08 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 10/6/20 4:56 AM, djosip+n...@linuxpages.net wrote: > On 2020-10-06 02:07, Phil Stracchino wrote: >> On 9/28/20 12:33 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: >>> test phase 1: All clients and Storage on 9.6.6, Director still on >>> 9.6.3 >>> No hung jobs so far. I plan to leave it this way for at least a

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-06 Thread djosip+news
On 2020-10-06 02:07, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 9/28/20 12:33 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: test phase 1: All clients and Storage on 9.6.6, Director still on 9.6.3 No hung jobs so far. I plan to leave it this way for at least a week before upgrading the Director to 9.6.6. as well. OK, a week

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-10-05 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 9/28/20 12:33 PM, Phil Stracchino wrote: On 2020-09-27 15:27, Phil Stracchino wrote: I'm going to re-test the job-hanging problem that I encountered with 9.6.5 Director and see whether that is resolved in 9.6.6 as well. It mysteriously appeared between 9.6.3 and 9.6.5, with luck it has

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-09-28 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 2020-09-27 15:27, Phil Stracchino wrote: > I'm going to re-test the job-hanging problem that I encountered with > 9.6.5 Director and see whether that is resolved in 9.6.6 as well. It > mysteriously appeared between 9.6.3 and 9.6.5, with luck it has vanished > as mysteriously. test phase 1:

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-09-27 Thread Phil Stracchino
On 2020-09-27 02:57, Josip Deanovic wrote: > So I am writing here to inform people who might experienced the > TLS error with bacula-fd 9.6.5 on Centos 7 and Centos 6 that Bacula > 9.6.6 has solved that problem. I'm going to re-test the job-hanging problem that I encountered with 9.6.5 Director

Re: [Bacula-users] Bacula 9.6.5 TLS issue - solved in 9.6.6

2020-09-27 Thread Mario Pranjic
Very good! Thanks for info! :) Best regards, -- Mario. søn. 27. sep. 2020 kl. 09:06 skrev Josip Deanovic < djosip+n...@linuxpages.net>: > Hello, > > I have stumbled upon bug in Bacula 9.6.5 on Centos 7 and Centos 6 > where bacula-fd would fail starting with error mentioning TLS > not being