Re: [Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

2009-03-16 Thread Uwe Schuerkamp
Hi folks, thanks for your suggestions, I tried your tar suggestion and indeed it turns out that transfer rates drop to the dozens of kb/sec in one special directory stored on the ocfs2 filesystem. I'm now in contact with the ocfs2 devs on the users list to see if they have any suggestions. All

Re: [Bacula-users] performance problems backing up ocfs2 clusters

2009-03-04 Thread Thomas Mueller
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 11:24:22 +0100, Uwe Schuerkamp wrote: Hello folks, we're experiencing massive problems backing up an ocfs2 cluster filesystem mounted on SLES 10 SP2 machines located on a shared SAN storage). The cluster has 8 members, and we've already tried certain mount options

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

2009-01-23 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:05 +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: Hi, My configuration is roughly like this: I back up about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and migrate the backups to tape once a week. Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on disk is currently about 25 Gb. I have also some

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

2009-01-23 Thread Pasi Kärkkäinen
On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 10:05:53AM +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: Hi, My configuration is roughly like this: I back up about 10 hosts to disk volume using bacula and migrate the backups to tape once a week. Backups work ok, the resulting volume file on disk is currently about 25 Gb. I have

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

2009-01-23 Thread Ari Suutari
Hi, What version of Bacula are you running? Which OS? What kind of hardware do you have? :) Sorry, I forgot those: Bacula 2.4.4, FreeBSD 7.1, disks are SATA disks and tape is HP DAT160. Ari S. -- This SF.net

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

2009-01-23 Thread Ari Suutari
Hi, This is know problem in bacula versions up to 2.4.4 It is fixed in recent beta 2.5.28-b1 This sounds great ! Are there any possibilities that the fix might be seen in future 2.4 versions, or should I just upgrade to beta versions ? Using beta versions is tempting, because I would like to use

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems in migration from disk to tape

2009-01-23 Thread Ulrich Leodolter
On Fri, 2009-01-23 at 10:58 +0200, Ari Suutari wrote: Hi, This is know problem in bacula versions up to 2.4.4 It is fixed in recent beta 2.5.28-b1 This sounds great ! Are there any possibilities that the fix might be seen in future 2.4 versions, or should Dont think so, there are major

Re: [Bacula-users] Performance problems

2006-11-15 Thread John Drescher
On 11/15/06, Manuel Staechele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello,i want restore a simple file from a FULL job which is not that big.and it took 10 hours to build the directory-tree.job informations:Type | Level | JobFiles | JobBytes| JobStatus | B| F |913,065 |17,818,106,395 | T--i have already