* Dennis Petschull schrieb am 04.03.10 um 08:04 Uhr:
Hey Marc,
Hi Dennis,
Yes, using curlftpfs 0.9.1 would be an option, but when I tried it, I ran
into
this bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/223239, which prohibits me to upload large
files to the FTP storage.
So this makes this version
Hi,
I am still very interested in this topic.
Is anyone using Bacula with FTP as storage backend? How do you handle this
situation?
Thanks for your help!
Cheers,
Dennis
--
two4.IT
http://www.two4.it
--
Am Samstag 13 Februar 2010 21:41:04 schrieb Dennis Petschull:
Hi Karsten and others,
I
* Dennis Petschull schrieb am 03.03.10 um 20:54 Uhr:
Hi,
I am still very interested in this topic.
Is anyone using Bacula with FTP as storage backend? How do you handle this
situation?
Thanks for your help!
Why not use 0.9.1 then instead? I do so and it works.
-Marc
--
Hey Marc,
Yes, using curlftpfs 0.9.1 would be an option, but when I tried it, I ran into
this bug, http://bugs.gentoo.org/223239, which prohibits me to upload large
files to the FTP storage.
So this makes this version unusable for me, too.
Cheers,
Dennis
--
two4.IT
http://www.two4.it
--
Am
Hi Karsten and others,
I have encountered the same issue some time ago, too.
Did you ever find a solution/workaround/alternative for it?
I would be very interested!
Cheers,
Dennis
--
two4.IT
http://www.two4.it
--
On Wednesday 6 January 2010 21:31 Karsten Schulze wrote:
I believe that bacula
I believe that bacula does not work anymore with curlftpfs (version 0.9.2).
I have found several reports which describe a similar behavior.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/curlftpfs/+bug/367091
http://sourceforge.net/projects/curlftpfs/forums/forum/542750/topic/3295831
Finally I found
