Re: Infallibility of the Guardian & Divine Guidance

2004-04-06 Thread William Michael
It is written: "it is not for individual believers to limit the sphere of the Guardian's authority, or to judge when they have to obey the Guardian and when they are free to reject his judgment." It is also written: "The infallibility of the Guardian is confined to matters which are related s

Re: Baha'is and Capitalism

2004-03-28 Thread William Michael
Dear Tim, I find your definition of capitalism way too under-specified to allow me any evaluative judgement of capitalism. You wrote: By this [the word 'capitalism'], I mean simply an economic/political system in which People who run businesses own the means of production, and employ workers

RE: Death penalty

2004-03-26 Thread William Michael
On the death penalty, it seems to me that we can't infer from the fact that Baha'i laws makes room for the death penalty to the conclusion that we should not object to any current state giving itself the right to kill its citizens. Jerome quoted from the US NSA: Baha'u'llah provides for capit

Re: Study

2004-03-22 Thread William Michael
Mark, You wrote in response to David's question: What several longitudinal studies suggest is that premarital sex is a reasonably good predictor of extramarital "cheating." Therefore, extramarital sex is sometimes an intervening variable between premarital sex and divorce. Interesting. Am

Re: Holy Quran 52:4

2004-03-22 Thread William Michael
Dear Don, Forgive me for intruding on this very learned conversation between you and Susan, but I was struck by your response and the distinction between interpretation and word play. You wrote, in order to reject one of Susan's arguments by finding a different status for the original words:

Re: science and religion

2004-02-19 Thread William Michael
Hi, Mark. In response to your e-mail I wont respond point for point. I get a bit lost that way. Let me restate my interest: the differences between ordinary discourse and scientific theory. I don't yet, however, have much understanding so I can't produce the good arguments I would like to. But

Re: science and religion

2004-02-16 Thread William Michael
Hi Mark, Your point about Revelation being more than the sacred texts and itself inspiring scientific work is correct, as your quotation from Gleanings p. 161, shows. More accurately p. 161 shows how spiritual souls who pass on do. but I think the general principle extends. I knew this, of cou

Re: science and religion

2004-02-09 Thread William Michael
Hi Mark, I wrote: >>I must admit I don't have a developed enough understanding of the language spoken by the Birds of Heaven and Doves of Eternity to say whether it is inappropriate to derive a scientific hypothesis or two from them.<< to which you responded: However, what Baha'u'llah's stat