Surely the 'Ruhi method' does not exclude other study?
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Baha'i Studies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2004 8:00 PM
Subject: Re: FW: To Brent: one point
In a message dated 12/9/2004 1:53:44 PM Central Standard Time
In a message dated 12/9/2004 5:33:40 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Surely the
'Ruhi method' does not exclude other study?
It does not. Over and over it says it does not.
However, the RTI's seem to think it does. All statistics concerning growth
are measured by no
Mark, you answered,
No, because a study circle has a broader function than a fireside.
My question then is: how does that distinction make such a difference?
__
You are subscribed to Baha'i Studies as: mailto:archive@mail-archive.com
To unsubscribe,
Hi, Richard,
At 06:50 PM 12/9/2004, you wrote:
My question then is: how does that distinction make such a difference?
Firesides are individual teaching activities. The firesides conducted one
person have no more official status than those conducted by others. OTOH, study
circles *are*
My question is: You would then have the same objections to a fireside talk
(rather common on 2 and 3) which has the same characteristics?
Dear Richard,
Well, the Guardian does tell us that we should know the Writings well enough
to give them in their pure form. However, most firesides speakers
