"We did not leave anything out of this Book, then all will be gathered before their Lord [for judgement]. (Qur'an 6:38)"
G: I don't think it gives positive support, they aren't even mentioned or implied. And in order to harmonize it you have to qualify "anything" to a certain degree... ...that's
Dear John,
Your previous post was edited in an odd way. Certain comments were
left out and I think it was a little unclear what arguments/comments
were being responded to. I'll try to clarify.
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 06:59:03 -0800 (PST), John Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We did not leave
Hi, Gilberto,
At 10:30 AM 1/10/2005, you wrote:
And I would suggest that Bahais don't seem to be very worried about all those
other figures they are implicitly saying no to.
In one sense, none of that matters. What God expects of His servants is to
recognize His Messenger in the age He
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 11:02:22 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Gilberto,
At 10:30 AM 1/10/2005, you wrote:
And I would suggest that Bahais don't seem to be very worried about all
those other figures they are implicitly saying no to.
In one sense, none of that matters.
G: Even today, there are many different groups claiming to be ledby the mahdi or his successors, or the second coming of christ, or thelatest installation of God's religion. From the Moonies, to the BranchDavidians, to the Matreya followers, to the Ahmadiya, or theAnsarullah, or the Nation of
Hi, Gilberto,
At 11:49 AM 1/10/2005, you wrote:
But even Iblis and the Dajjal have a particular spiritual function, no?,
For those who believe in the devil and/or the anti-Christ, they have a
function. A position, even an imaginary one, can perform a role (expected
behavior) without having an
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:51:59 -0600, Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, Gilberto,
At 11:49 AM 1/10/2005, you wrote:
But even Iblis and the Dajjal have a particular spiritual function, no?,
Mark:
For those who believe in the devil and/or the anti-Christ, they have a
function. A
On Mon, 10 Jan 2005 10:15:39 -0800 (PST), JS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G: Even today, there are many different groups claiming to be led
by the mahdi or his successors, or the second coming of christ, or the
latest installation of God's religion. From the Moonies, to the Branch
Davidians,
Gilberto,
At 01:49 PM 1/10/2005, you wrote:
I didn't mean to invoke a discussion on whether Satan is literally real or
metaphorical or something else. I just meant that at least as I understand
it, the Dajjal is supposed to be a false claimant and that in fact there
would be many false
Hi, Gilberto,
Sorry, I forgot to respond to your last paragraph.
I wrote:
I accept all of their claims equally. However, I am not asserting a
divine involvement with all of them. (How would I know?) I am simply
affirming the particularity of their paradigms. As I said before, whether
I
In a message dated 1/9/2005 3:08:29 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What great spiritual truth of one religion was missing from the previous ones?
This is much like saying: "So what in particular were you never told?"
Regards,
Scott
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 16:11:21 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/9/2005 3:08:29 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What great spiritual truth of one religion was missing from the previous
ones?
This is much like saying: So what in particular
In a message dated 1/9/2005 5:39:45 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
actually think that the different bags are going to mostly have thesame contents. I would be hard pressed to find something which is onebag and not in the others. The contents might be arranged
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 19:59:41 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/9/2005 5:39:45 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
actually think that the different bags are going to mostly have the
same contents. I would be hard pressed to find something which
In a message dated 1/9/2005 10:13:36 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I"m not sure what you mean. The Bahai faith claims to be a progressionor advancement over Islam and other religions, no? If so, wouldn'tthat imply that there is something in the Bahai bag, which isn't inthe
On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 23:14:50 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 1/9/2005 10:13:36 PM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Im not sure what you mean. The Bahai faith claims to be a progression
or advancement over Islam and other religions, no? If so,
In a message dated 1/9/2005 10:39:47 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Nevertheless its a sincere response. Instead of resorting toname-calling you should just say where the mistake is.
To call a response "obtuse" is not calling anyone a name, Gilberto. No offense was
17 matches
Mail list logo
