Dear Dean,
I do agree with you. Despite the enormous evolution of tolerance and open-mind
during the last century, the evolution of mankind is clearly not finished!
What always have put me in trouble, is why the "Alliance" (in french), being
celebrated in jewish, christians, islamics... writings
ral, has not fulfilled
> its part of
> the Greater Covenant as described below
Dear Dean,
Then I would say that hasn't happened yet.
warmest, Susan
The information contained in this e-mail and any attachments thereto ("e-mail")
is sent by the Johnson County Communi
rt of
the Greater Covenant as described below:
The Greater Covenant (also referred to as "the general Covenant", WOB 137,
and "the Eternal Covenant" SWA 227) concerns the promise on the part of
God,
given through one of the Manifestations of God, that He will not leave
huma
I also makes the mistake of assuming that mankind makes ONE decision about
anything. Mankind is not a single organism, it's not even a hive. It is a huge
collection of individuals who make their own decisions for their own reasons.
Mankind does not accept a Revelation. I accept a Revelation and
> Are the following statements correct?
>
> Mankind has never fulfilled its side of the Covenant, ie., to
> recognize the next manifestation, and yet, notwithstanding, God
> has continued to send us the succession of guidance, from Moses,
> Jesus, Muhammad, to the Bab and Baha'u'llah.
>
> The
Are the following statements correct?
Mankind has never fulfilled its side of the Covenant, ie., to recognize the
next manifestation, and yet, notwithstanding, God has continued to send us the
succession of guidance, from Moses, Jesus, Muhammad, to the Bab and Baha'u'llah.
The Jews have not rec
