Mark,
Just out of curiosity: why did you use the term unity of religions in the
post to which I responded?
Richard.
- Original Message -
From: Mark A. Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Baha'i Studies [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: Eclecticism
Richard,
At 11:26 AM 1/6/2004 -0800, you wrote:
Just out of curiosity: why did you use the term unity of religions in the post to
which I responded?
That was the context of the discussion on the Study Circle list, where I originally
posted the message. There is a Baha'i who was arguing that
Mark,
You have broached this subject in past posts. And I indicated in a later
post that your point was well made out. My superficial search indicated
then, as it does now, that oneness of religions and unity of religions
do not show up on Ocean in any authenticated Scriptures.
Another
Richard,
At 03:15 PM 1/6/2004 -0800, you quoted:
Briefly, it is not so much a new religion as Religion renewed and unified, which is
directed today by Abdul-Baha.
(Abdu'l-Baha, Tablets of Abdu'l-Baha v1, p. viii)
It seems to me that `Abdu'l-Baha here used religion in much the same way as
