On 12/6/2010 11:25 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
I sure hope that we don't dismiss the reading of such books just
because every experienced programmer knows about refactoring.
I apologize if I gave that impression. I think books like these provide
programmers with a head start on techniques and
On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Kenneth Gonsalves law...@au-kbc.org wrote:
hi,
I know that this has cropped up in a parallel thread, but anyway I would
like a new thread on this. In a LUG list a ruby guy made a statement
that 'No self respecting developer could function without having read
d. Refactoring without having test cases is a strong test for bravery.
Usually I classify myself as timid in such situations and either write some
tests or back off.
Absolutely. I'd put myself into the same category.
___
BangPypers mailing list
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to follow up my post with another one, but here is an old link fro
JOS related to this, which is still relevant.
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/fog69.html
This post
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 9:41 PM, Vijay Ramachandran vijay...@gmail.comwrote:
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:35 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry to follow up my post with another one, but here is an old link fro
JOS related to this, which is still
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 10:10 +0530, Sirtaj Singh Kang wrote:
[dubious aside: remember this one?
Please note that there is no deeper meaning to be read into the fact
that I mistakenly pasted the quote twice.
two hours of wasted time trying to figure out if you had refactored the
quote
--
