This is to allow the alternate implementations to catch up, and not
really about the users of the python language. Adding breaking changes
between versions of python 3 would just be bad language design, so
users should be fine either way.
I've found myself quite happy using many of the new
A.M. Kuchling has published an article related to this on LWN.
This has been under discussion in Pydev for a couple of weeks now...
It would be interesting to know the opinion of folks here on this...
http://lwn.net/SubscriberLink/361266/ef88bdbed5369800/
Here is the related PEP link.
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:20 AM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
A.M. Kuchling has published an article related to this on LWN.
This has been under discussion in Pydev for a couple of weeks now...
On Friday 13 Nov 2009 11:50:32 am Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
It would be interesting to know the opinion of folks here on
this...[..]
I've been following the discussion. I think it's eminently sensible.
I also thought so. More than the catching up part, I think perhaps
Guido
