-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday 24 August 2013 09:21 AM, Sriram Narayanan wrote:
I agree. There aren't all that many job postings, and even if the
odd person hit a reply to all, we can just ignore it.
What's more important is that responses to genuine questions
Thanks for your hard work, Anand. Most of us users are used to consuming
services. There is a lot of work that happens in the background, and I want
you to know that I appreciate the work that various moderators do.
-- Ram
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Anand B Pillai
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi List,
The mailing list settings has been modified to change the
default reply-to address to the poster. Earlier it was
the list itself.
This was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 August 2013 06:30 PM, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
+1.
It is irritating to know that you have only replied to the
recipient and not the list an then forward it back again. There is
no point in optimizing for one off cases such as job
My vote is with AnandC and Vinayak. I've suffered from the same.
Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 23 August 2013 06:30 PM, Vinayak Hegde wrote:
+1.
It is irritating to know that you have only replied to the
recipient
Anand B Pillai anandpil...@letterboxes.org writes:
Hi List,
The mailing list settings has been modified to change the
default reply-to address to the poster. Earlier it was
the list itself.
Is that a good idea? Gnus is smart enough to handle lists specially so
I'm not particularly
I agree. There aren't all that many job postings, and even if the odd
person hit a reply to all, we can just ignore it.
What's more important is that responses to genuine questions reach the list
instead of being missed out because of an inadvertent Reply.
-- Ram
On Sat, Aug 24, 2013 at 8:26
