Just for context, here's the email where Danny says that he was not
offended by the first email and didn't interpret it in the way that
Pratham did
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2014-May/010161.html
and my follow up reply saying that I didn't mean it that way either.
At the risk of giving a non-issue more visibility, we’re being extremely
silly here. I went through the emails here and I dont find anything
offensive or sarcastic or twisted in any of the replies. I do however find
2 things odd though.
- Senthil’s original reply of *I looked and found it*
Ha, I stand corrected. Senthil's reponse did contain everything the
original poster wanted. Now I'm not sure what everyone's upset about.
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:45 PM, Jeffrey Jose jeffjosej...@gmail.comwrote:
At the risk of giving a non-issue more visibility, we’re being extremely
silly
On Thu, May 22, 2014 at 3:30 PM, bangpypers-requ...@python.org wrote:
Just for context, here's the email where Danny says that he was not
offended by the first email and didn't interpret it in the way that
Pratham did
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/bangpypers/2014-May/010161.html
and my
Let's just let this pass? I, for one, don't have the time or interest to
handle these kinds of things. If any of the people want to discuss this
on the list, please do but I don't really want to spend any of my time
on it.
--
Cordially,
Noufal
http://nibrahim.net.in
On May 22, 2014, at 8:14 AM, Noufal Ibrahim KV nou...@nibrahim.net.in wrote:
Let's just let this pass? I, for one, don't have the time or interest to
handle these kinds of things. If any of the people want to discuss this
on the list, please do but I don't really want to spend any of my time
on
