[BangPypers] #lazyweb - How would the wsgi lite proposal help in ..

2011-08-01 Thread Dhananjay Nene
After Armin Ronacher's post http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2011/7/27/the-pluggable-pipedream/ P. J. Eby responded with http://dirtsimple.org/2011/07/wsgi-is-dead-long-live-wsgi-lite.html with an implementation at https://bitbucket.org/pje/wsgi_lite/ While I could potentially read up the details and

Re: [BangPypers] #lazyweb - How would the wsgi lite proposal help in ..

2011-08-01 Thread Anand Chitipothu
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com: After Armin Ronacher's post http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2011/7/27/the-pluggable-pipedream/ P. J. Eby responded with http://dirtsimple.org/2011/07/wsgi-is-dead-long-live-wsgi-lite.html with an implementation at https://bitbucket.org/pje/wsgi_lite/

Re: [BangPypers] #lazyweb - How would the wsgi lite proposal help in ..

2011-08-01 Thread Dhananjay Nene
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com: [..] How could the above proposal (if it does) help in a) Creating simpler, lighter frameworks (eg. flask) b) Help support greater asynchronicity (a la tornado,