On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 19:57 +0530, Anand Balachandran Pillai wrote:
xml parsing in the case when all that you need from the string is a
simple
numeric value(not a string), then good luck; unlike esr i will not
use
adjectives; but i would not use your code either.
To be fair here, I
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Asif Jamadar asif.jama...@rezayat.netwrote:
What if I have two lists for both minimum and maximum values
Minimum Maximum
0 10
11 20
21 30
31 40
Now how should I check if actual result is not laying
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
re.search(distance\s*(\d+)\s*/distance,data).group(1)
would appear to be the most succinct and quite fast. Adjust for
whitespace
as and if necessary.
On 31-Jul-2011, at 11:33 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
A regex is the simplest IMHO, because you need not know the syntax of the
minidom parser.
But, again i have seen this quiet often that lack of knowledge of regexp has
led people to other solutions (the grapes are sour!)
In the eternal words
After Armin Ronacher's post
http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2011/7/27/the-pluggable-pipedream/ P. J. Eby
responded with
http://dirtsimple.org/2011/07/wsgi-is-dead-long-live-wsgi-lite.html
with an implementation at https://bitbucket.org/pje/wsgi_lite/
While I could potentially read up the details and
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Kiran Jonnalagadda j...@pobox.com wrote:
On 31-Jul-2011, at 11:33 PM, Venkatraman S wrote:
A regex is the simplest IMHO, because you need not know the syntax of the
minidom parser.
But, again i have seen this quiet often that lack of knowledge of regexp
by using lxml...for example-:
from lxml import etree
content = etree.iterparse( *name of the xml file*, events=('start', 'end'))
for event, elem in content:
if elem.tag == 'distance':
print elem.text
Hope it will work..
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 1:43 PM,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Asif Jamadar asif.jama...@rezayat.net wrote:
What if I have two lists for both minimum and maximum values
Minimum Maximum
0 10
11 20
21 30
31 40
Now how should I check if actual result is not laying
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
Venkatraman S venka...@gmail.com writes:
Hang around in #django or #python. The most elegant code that you
*should* write would invariably be pretty fast (am not ref to asm).
I agree with you here. Pythonicity is best
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Asif Jamadar asif.jama...@rezayat.net
wrote:
What if I have two lists for both minimum and maximum values
Minimum Maximum
0 10
11 20
21 30
31 40
Now
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Asif Jamadar asif.jama...@rezayat.net
wrote:
What if I have two lists for both minimum and maximum values
Minimum Maximum
0
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com wrote:
I also find map much more atomic and portable construct to think in -
after all every list comprehension is syntactic sugar around map +
filter, and map/reduce/filter are far more omnipresent than list
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Asif Jamadar asif.jama...@rezayat.net
wrote:
What if I have two lists for both
2011/8/1 Baishampayan Ghose b.gh...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com
wrote:
I also find map much more atomic and portable construct to think in -
after all every list comprehension is syntactic sugar around map +
filter, and map/reduce/filter
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
I also find map much more atomic and portable construct to think in -
after all every list comprehension is syntactic sugar around map +
filter, and map/reduce/filter are far more omnipresent than list
comprehensions.
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
After Armin Ronacher's post
http://lucumr.pocoo.org/2011/7/27/the-pluggable-pipedream/ P. J. Eby
responded with
http://dirtsimple.org/2011/07/wsgi-is-dead-long-live-wsgi-lite.html
with an implementation at https://bitbucket.org/pje/wsgi_lite/
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM, Asif
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:41 PM, Baishampayan Ghose b.gh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:38 PM, Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com
wrote:
I also find map much more atomic and portable construct to think in -
after all every list comprehension is syntactic sugar around map +
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
[..]
How could the above proposal (if it does) help in
a) Creating simpler, lighter frameworks (eg. flask)
b) Help support greater asynchronicity (a la tornado,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.comwrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 2:15 PM,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/8/1 Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com
wrote:
2011/8/1
Anand Balachandran Pillai abpil...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.comwrote:
[...]
It is more subtler than that.
List comprehensions are faster than map functions when
the latter needs to invoke a user-defined function call or a lambda.
Dear Python Community,
This is to inform you that GuRu Prevails is conducting a Python workshop
starting 3rd August 2011.
The timings are as follows
3rd August 2011 - 6 P.M. - 10 P.M
4th August 2011 - 6 P.M. - 10 P.M.
10th August 2011 - 4 P.M. - 10 P.M.
11th August 2011 - 5 P.M. - 10 P.M.
The
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
Anand Balachandran Pillai abpil...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.comwrote:
[...]
It is more subtler than that.
List comprehensions are faster than map functions
I knew there was a way to better implement flatmap - its a combination
of itertools.chain.from_iterable and map. Here's a much cleaner code
from itertools import chain
print filter(lambda (x,y,z) : x*x + y*y == z*z,
chain.from_iterable(map(
lambda x: chain.from_iterable(map(
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Noufal Ibrahim nou...@gmail.com wrote:
Anand Balachandran Pillai abpil...@gmail.com writes:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com
wrote:
[...]
It is more subtler than that.
List comprehensions are faster than map
Anand Balachandran Pillai abpil...@gmail.com writes:
[...]
Maybe I should have rephrased it like this.
- If using anonymous functions, prefer list comps over map.
- If using built-in functions (C functions), prefer map over list comps.
- If using pythonic user functions, there is nothing
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
I knew there was a way to better implement flatmap - its a combination
of itertools.chain.from_iterable and map. Here's a much cleaner code
from itertools import chain
print filter(lambda (x,y,z) : x*x + y*y == z*z,
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Anand Chitipothu anandol...@gmail.com wrote:
I was trying to translate Python list-comprehensions into Javascript
and here is what I've come up with.
$pyjs.listcomp(
function(x, y, z) { return [x, y, z]},
[
range(1, 100),
function(x) {
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Dhananjay Nene dhananjay.n...@gmail.comwrote:
On Mon, Aug 1, 2011 at 7:26 PM, Anand Balachandran Pillai
abpil...@gmail.com wrote:
IMHO, map/filter/reduce and the inevitable companion lambda were
added on to Python when it was still trying to find its
30 matches
Mail list logo
