Hi Ahmad.
> >> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> >> obj-y += setup.o
> >> +pbl-y += at91_pmc_ll.o
> >
> > Will this always make my pbl image larger or do we have some linker
> > magic that throws away the unused code?
>
> My understanding is that barebox instructs GCC to place each out-of-line
> function
>
Hi Ahmad.
> >
> > If we introduced the following small helpers we could simplify the call
> > sites
> > to just use at91_get_ddram_size(AT91SAM9G45_BASE_DDRSDRC0) and similar.
> >
> > static inline u32 at91_get_ddram_size(void __force __iomem * addr)
> > {
> > return
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 08:39:56PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> On 2/4/19 19:38, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Ahmad.
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:13PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> Low level init code might want to disable the watchdog in PBL.
> >> Provide a helper to do
Hello Sam,
On 2/4/19 19:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:14PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> For use by future at91 first stage bootloaders, this commit imports
>> https://github.com/linux4sam/at91bootstrap/blob/v3.8.12/driver/pmc.c
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad
Hello Sam,
On 2/4/19 19:38, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:13PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Low level init code might want to disable the watchdog in PBL.
>> Provide a helper to do so.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
>> ---
>>
Hi Sam,
On 2/4/19 19:25, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:12PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Instead of adding missing definitions to the existing at91sam9_ddrsdr.h
>> and adapting the incoming DDRAM initialization code from at91bootstrap,
>> just replace the
Hi Ahmad.
It is super that you are working on this and I hope we can have bootstrap
support for more at91 variants in the near future.
> This is (the hopefully final and bestest) v3 of a series that pulls in
> enough of at91bootstrap to make barebox usable as first stage bootloader
> for the
Hi Ahmad.
Thanks for adding the docs.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
> ---
> .../boards/at91/microchip-ksz9477-evb.rst | 38 ++-
> 1 file changed, 36 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git
Hi Ahmad.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:18PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Incoming microchip-ksz9477-evb first stage will add one more entry point
> for the first stage. As there is a little reason to use the same piggy
> data for both images (BOOT.BIN, the first stage, is limited to 64K), have
>
Hi Ahmad.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:18:13PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Low level init code might want to disable the watchdog in PBL.
> Provide a helper to do so.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-at91/include/mach/at91_wdt.h | 16
> 1 file changed, 16
Hi Ahmad.
Thanks for looking into this.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 12:32:57PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> sama5d2 was added along with the update to the upstream
> device tree bindings, but wasn't wired in anywhere.
>
> To prepare for usage in future sama5d2 support, fix
> compilation errors
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 11:34:27PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> compiling clk-generated.c results in:
>
> warning: passing argument 1 of 'memcpy' discards 'const' qualifier from
> pointer target type [-Wdiscarded-qualifiers]
> memcpy(gck->hw.parent_names, parent_names, parents_array_size);
>
Hello Kai,
On 4/2/19 3:22 PM, Kai Che wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm trying to communicate with SPI in barebox on the MC iMX7 Sabre Board.
>
> I added the options in my barebox config:
>
> CONFIG_SPI=y
> CONFIG_CMD_SPI=y
How about CONFIG_DRIVER_SPI_IMX?
>
> But there is no SPI bus when I try to
Hi all,
I'm trying to communicate with SPI in barebox on the MC iMX7 Sabre Board.
I added the options in my barebox config:
CONFIG_SPI=y
CONFIG_CMD_SPI=y
But there is no SPI bus when I try to communicate with:
barebox@Freescale i.MX7 SabreSD Board:/ spi 0x1
spi bus 0 not found
spi: No such
14 matches
Mail list logo
