On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 10:19:47AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> We'll want reliable ordering for other SD/MMC using boards as well, thus
> move the alias out of the board device tree into the SoC's.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
> ---
> arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-dk1.dtsi | 4
>
On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 08:35:22AM +0100, Stefan Riedmueller wrote:
> Make use of the upstream devicetree for the phyCORE-i.MX 6 and the
> phyBOARD-Mira to reduce code duplication. In this context also add a
> Mira devicetree for barebox to better differentiate between phyCORE
> related settings
While Linux doesn't have a device node for the DDR controller,
U-Boot and ARM TF-A do and they both use the st,stm32mp1-ddr compatible,
which encompasses both DDRCTRL and DDRPHY. Follow suit.
---
arch/arm/mach-stm32mp/ddrctrl.c | 20 ++--
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10
While Linux doesn't have a device node for the DDR controller,
U-Boot and ARM TF-A do and they both use the st,stm32mp1-ddr compatible,
which encompasses both DDRCTRL and DDRPHY. Follow suit.
---
arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157c.dtsi | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
Hi Sascha,
thank you for your response and the information about the key handling
for the FIT image.
i will be try it.
Best regards
Maik
Am 12.11.2019 um 12:51 schrieb Sascha Hauer:
> Hi Maik,
>
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 04:21:44PM +0200, Maik Otto wrote:
>> the habv4-imx6-gencsf.h is necessary