exceed 80 characters in a line, but more readble and agree with
upper lines.
Signed-off-by: Du Huanpeng
---
arch/mips/Makefile | 4 +---
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/mips/Makefile b/arch/mips/Makefile
index ee465dc..1c10db5 100644
--- a/arch/mips/Makefile
On 11/25/19 9:28 AM, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 09:40:05AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Both the STM32 and i.MX7 remote proc drivers populate the .stop member
>> in the struct rproc, but it's not used anywhere.
>
> The .stop member in struct rproc is introduced in this patch.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 07:57:03PM +0800, Du Huanpeng wrote:
> Hi.
>
> > Actually all of this lines haw incorrect coding style. It should be 80
> > char width style.
> I see this, but it is more practical here. the editor will automatic warp
> lines.
>
> I can write a better description and
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 08:04:27PM +0100, Clement Leger wrote:
> Add ISSI 128Mb nor flash.
>
> Signed-off-by: Clement Leger
> ---
> - Add missing Signed-off-by
>
> drivers/mtd/spi-nor/spi-nor.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
Applied, thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K.
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 02:39:29PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> I've spent some time trying to get the ONF (Watchdog enable status)
> bit in the IWDG_SR register to read as something other than zero.
>
> It has since been confirmed to be non-functional[1]. To avoid someone
> else spending time on
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 03:08:01PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Fixes: 06928c7d1758 (mfd: da9053: use new reset_source_set_device)
> Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach
> ---
> drivers/mfd/da9053.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Applied to master, thanks
Sascha
--
Pengutronix
On Thu, Nov 21, 2019 at 09:40:05AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Both the STM32 and i.MX7 remote proc drivers populate the .stop member
> in the struct rproc, but it's not used anywhere.
The .stop member in struct rproc is introduced in this patch.
> The firmware API is not
> really fitting to
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 09:35:36AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> struct rproc has a device_d dev field, but so far it was unregistered.
> The implementation had a few downsides:
>
> - dev_printf prints NULL, because the unique_name of the device is NULL
> - The name used by firmwareload is the
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 08:41:39AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> We no longer use __dtb_start on ARM and the declaration is unused in the
> file. Drop it.
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
> ---
> arch/arm/cpu/dtb.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
Applied, thanks
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 08:38:16AM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> data->{blocks, blocksize, flags} are all used outside of the if clause
> checking whether data is not NULL.
> Fix this to avoid dereferencing null pointers.
>
> Fixes: bdcf89d274 ("mci: add Marvell Dove SDHCI driver")
> Cc: Michael
10 matches
Mail list logo