On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 02:23:56PM +0200, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> While we'll continue to support barebox,provide-mac-address, new boards
> should prefer using the upstream NVMEM binding for describing the MAC address.
>
> Add an example to the documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
> ---
On 23-09-11, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> On 11.09.23 14:29, Marco Felsch wrote:
> > On 23-09-11, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> While we'll continue to support barebox,provide-mac-address, new boards
> >> should prefer using the upstream NVMEM binding for describing the MAC
> >> address.
> >>
> >> Add an
On 11.09.23 14:29, Marco Felsch wrote:
> On 23-09-11, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> While we'll continue to support barebox,provide-mac-address, new boards
>> should prefer using the upstream NVMEM binding for describing the MAC
>> address.
>>
>> Add an example to the documentation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:
On 23-09-11, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> While we'll continue to support barebox,provide-mac-address, new boards
> should prefer using the upstream NVMEM binding for describing the MAC address.
>
> Add an example to the documentation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
> ---
>
While we'll continue to support barebox,provide-mac-address, new boards
should prefer using the upstream NVMEM binding for describing the MAC address.
Add an example to the documentation.
Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum
---
.../bindings/misc/fsl,imx-ocotp.rst | 25 ---
1
