Hello Sascha,
On 20/2/19 08:55, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:10:02PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> Hello Sam,
>>
>> On 19/2/19 21:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>>> Hi Ahmad.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 01:06:10PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
This is in line with other
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 10:10:02PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> On 19/2/19 21:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Ahmad.
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 01:06:10PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >> This is in line with other platforms such as i.MX, which allow
> >> specifying a debug
Hi Ahmad.
> I think it should remain build-time configurable, to account for cases
> such as when the designated debug port isn't usable for whatever reason
> (e.g. its exposed via a USB-to-UART bridge and you want to use a proper
> UART, because you hate that the disconnection on power cycle..).
Hello,
On 19/2/19 22:10, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Sam,
>
> On 19/2/19 21:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> Hi Ahmad.
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 01:06:10PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>> This is in line with other platforms such as i.MX, which allow
>>> specifying a debug port. As we can't use
Hello Sam,
On 19/2/19 21:42, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Ahmad.
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 01:06:10PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>> This is in line with other platforms such as i.MX, which allow
>> specifying a debug port. As we can't use port indices because
>> the UARTs aren't mapped
Hi Ahmad.
On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 01:06:10PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> This is in line with other platforms such as i.MX, which allow
> specifying a debug port. As we can't use port indices because
> the UARTs aren't mapped consecutively, allow specifying a hex
> base at configuration time.
>
This is in line with other platforms such as i.MX, which allow
specifying a debug port. As we can't use port indices because
the UARTs aren't mapped consecutively, allow specifying a hex
base at configuration time.
A side effect of this patch is that sama5d4's HAVE_AT91_DBGU2
is now honored as
