On Thu, 1 Apr 2021 15:52:14 +0200
Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 05.04.14 21:27, alex.aring at gmail.com (Alexander Aring) wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:02:45PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> >> Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 ?? Antony Pavlov >> gmail.com>:
> >> Amused: http://www.c
Hi,
On 05.04.14 21:27, alex.aring at gmail.com (Alexander Aring) wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:02:45PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
>> Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 ?? Antony Pavlov :
>> Amused: http://www.coreboot.org/File:Coreboot_libpayload_tint.png
>> This is a really missing feature
Hello Sascha,
I think there is interest in EFI support. It's a good thing to implement
a standard boot concept. It could be used on ARM aswell.
The really bad thing about EFI is that it requires runtime services to
access the EFI variables from the kernel. For this the kernel calls back
into boot
On Sun, Apr 06, 2014 at 04:32:19PM +0200, Michel Stam wrote:
> Hello Antony,
>
> Interesting idea- I wonder if its difficult given that U-boot is
> already supported?
>
> Personally I have no experience with coreboot, the systems I test on
> are industrial x86 SBCs with their own BIOS. I suppose
On Tue, Apr 08, 2014 at 11:45:45PM +0200, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 04/05/2014 09:02 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> > Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 от Antony Pavlov :
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements.
> >>
> >> IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot
On 04/05/2014 09:02 PM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 от Antony Pavlov :
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements.
>>
>> IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox
>> promotion.
>>
>> Please see http://www.
On Apr 6, 2014, at 10:32 PM, Michel Stam wrote:
> Hello Antony,
>
> Interesting idea- I wonder if its difficult given that U-boot is already
> supported?
>
> Personally I have no experience with coreboot, the systems I test on are
> industrial x86 SBCs with their own BIOS. I suppose it is oo
On Apr 6, 2014, at 3:02 AM, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 от Antony Pavlov :
>> Hi!
>>
>> I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements.
>>
>> IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox
>> promotion.
>>
>> Please see h
Hello Antony,
Interesting idea- I wonder if its difficult given that U-boot is already
supported?
Personally I have no experience with coreboot, the systems I test on are
industrial x86 SBCs with their own BIOS. I suppose it is oossible, maybe we can
borrow code from u-boot.
Another thing alo
On Sat, Apr 05, 2014 at 11:02:45PM +0400, Alexander Shiyan wrote:
> Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 от Antony Pavlov :
> > Hi!
> >
> > I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements.
> >
> > IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox
> > promotion.
>
Sat, 5 Apr 2014 23:00:29 +0400 от Antony Pavlov :
> Hi!
>
> I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements.
>
> IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox
> promotion.
>
> Please see http://www.coreboot.org/Payloads
>
> --
Amused: http://www.core
Hi!
I have seen your recent activity on barebox-x86 improvements.
IMHO using barebox-x86 as a coreboot payload can be beneficial for barebox
promotion.
Please see http://www.coreboot.org/Payloads
--
Best regards,
Antony Pavlov
___
barebox mailing
12 matches
Mail list logo