Sascha:
> In order to get an idea of how routing is supposed to work I had to look
> around in the code. It's really a pain to see and I really don't want to
> have to debug it. The combination of two spaces indentation and a huge
> #ifdef density makes it really hard to read.
Indentation is
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:53:47PM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
> >> This hasn't
> >> seen development activity in 5 years.
> >
> > Please see https://github.com/virtualsquare/picotcp
>
> But the TCP/IPV4 standard didn't change, either.
>
> >> lwIP on the other hand still sees active
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:50:58PM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:20:27 +0100
> Sascha Hauer wrote:
>
>
> Hi Sascha!
>
> > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100
> > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:20:27 +0100
Sascha Hauer wrote:
Hi Sascha!
> On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100
> > Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >
> > Hi All!
> >
> > > Hello Antony,
> > >
> > > On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> >
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100
> Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>
> Hi All!
>
> > Hello Antony,
> >
> > On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
> > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi All!
> >
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100
Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
Hi All!
> Hello Antony,
>
> On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
> > Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >
> > Hi All!
> >
> >> Hello Dan,
> >>
> >> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
>
Hello,
On 20.02.24 14:53, Alessandro Rubini wrote:
>>> This hasn't
>>> seen development activity in 5 years.
>>
>> Please see https://github.com/virtualsquare/picotcp
>
> But the TCP/IPV4 standard didn't change, either.
I don't mind lack of new features, but I'd prefer that when we
adopt an
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:17:02PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> Hello Dan,
>
> On 19.02.24 03:17, Dan Shelton wrote:
> > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 09:51, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >>
> >> Hello Antony,
> >>
> >> On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
> >>>
Hello Dan,
On 19.02.24 03:17, Dan Shelton wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 09:51, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>
>> Hello Antony,
>>
>> On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
>>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
>>> Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi All!
>>>
Hello Dan,
On 31.01.24 22:03,
>> This hasn't
>> seen development activity in 5 years.
>
> Please see https://github.com/virtualsquare/picotcp
But the TCP/IPV4 standard didn't change, either.
>> lwIP on the other hand still sees active development.
>
> I agree with you. It looks like lwIP is more popular than picotcp.
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100
Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
Hi Ahmad!
> Hello Antony,
>
> On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
> > Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >
> > Hi All!
> >
> >> Hello Dan,
> >>
> >> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 09:51, Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>
> Hello Antony,
>
> On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
> > Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
> >
> > Hi All!
> >
> >> Hello Dan,
> >>
> >> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
> >>> Hello!
> >>>
> >>> Does barebox
Hello Antony,
On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
> Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>
> Hi All!
>
>> Hello Dan,
>>
>> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
>>> Hello!
>>>
>>> Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from
>>> NFSv4 filesystem
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 19:31, Antony Pavlov wrote:
>
> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
> Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
>
> Hi all!
>
> > Hello Dan,
> >
> > On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from
> > > NFSv4
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
Hi all!
> Hello Dan,
>
> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from
> > NFSv4 filesystem into a Linux NFSv4 netroot (diskless machine)?
>
> The barebox
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100
Ahmad Fatoum wrote:
Hi All!
> Hello Dan,
>
> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from
> > NFSv4 filesystem into a Linux NFSv4 netroot (diskless machine)?
>
> The barebox
Hello Dan,
On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from
> NFSv4 filesystem into a Linux NFSv4 netroot (diskless machine)?
The barebox network stack only does UDP/IP. There have been attempts to
bring a TCP stack into
17 matches
Mail list logo