Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-03-09 Thread Alessandro Rubini
Sascha: > In order to get an idea of how routing is supposed to work I had to look > around in the code. It's really a pain to see and I really don't want to > have to debug it. The combination of two spaces indentation and a huge > #ifdef density makes it really hard to read. Indentation is

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-03-08 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 02:53:47PM +0100, Alessandro Rubini wrote: > >> This hasn't > >> seen development activity in 5 years. > > > > Please see https://github.com/virtualsquare/picotcp > > But the TCP/IPV4 standard didn't change, either. > > >> lwIP on the other hand still sees active

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-28 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 02:50:58PM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote: > On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:20:27 +0100 > Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Hi Sascha! > > > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100 > > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > > > > Hi

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-28 Thread Antony Pavlov
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 10:20:27 +0100 Sascha Hauer wrote: Hi Sascha! > On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100 > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > > Hi All! > > > > > Hello Antony, > > > > > > On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: > >

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-28 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Wed, Feb 28, 2024 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Antony Pavlov wrote: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100 > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > Hi All! > > > Hello Antony, > > > > On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 > > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > > > > Hi All! > >

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-27 Thread Antony Pavlov
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100 Ahmad Fatoum wrote: Hi All! > Hello Antony, > > On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > > Hi All! > > > >> Hello Dan, > >> > >> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: > >>> Hello! > >>> >

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-26 Thread Ahmad Fatoum
Hello, On 20.02.24 14:53, Alessandro Rubini wrote: >>> This hasn't >>> seen development activity in 5 years. >> >> Please see https://github.com/virtualsquare/picotcp > > But the TCP/IPV4 standard didn't change, either. I don't mind lack of new features, but I'd prefer that when we adopt an

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-20 Thread Uwe Kleine-König
On Tue, Feb 20, 2024 at 03:17:02PM +0100, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > Hello Dan, > > On 19.02.24 03:17, Dan Shelton wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 09:51, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > >> > >> Hello Antony, > >> > >> On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: > >>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 > >>>

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-20 Thread Ahmad Fatoum
Hello Dan, On 19.02.24 03:17, Dan Shelton wrote: > On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 09:51, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >> >> Hello Antony, >> >> On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: >>> On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 >>> Ahmad Fatoum wrote: >>> >>> Hi All! >>> Hello Dan, On 31.01.24 22:03,

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-20 Thread Alessandro Rubini
>> This hasn't >> seen development activity in 5 years. > > Please see https://github.com/virtualsquare/picotcp But the TCP/IPV4 standard didn't change, either. >> lwIP on the other hand still sees active development. > > I agree with you. It looks like lwIP is more popular than picotcp.

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-19 Thread Antony Pavlov
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 09:51:02 +0100 Ahmad Fatoum wrote: Hi Ahmad! > Hello Antony, > > On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > > Hi All! > > > >> Hello Dan, > >> > >> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: > >>> Hello! > >>>

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-18 Thread Dan Shelton
On Sat, 17 Feb 2024 at 09:51, Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > Hello Antony, > > On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 > > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > > > Hi All! > > > >> Hello Dan, > >> > >> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: > >>> Hello! > >>> > >>> Does barebox

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-17 Thread Ahmad Fatoum
Hello Antony, On 05.02.24 10:59, Antony Pavlov wrote: > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > Hi All! > >> Hello Dan, >> >> On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: >>> Hello! >>> >>> Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from >>> NFSv4 filesystem

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-05 Thread Dan Shelton
On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 19:31, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 > Ahmad Fatoum wrote: > > Hi all! > > > Hello Dan, > > > > On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from > > > NFSv4

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-05 Thread Antony Pavlov
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 Ahmad Fatoum wrote: Hi all! > Hello Dan, > > On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from > > NFSv4 filesystem into a Linux NFSv4 netroot (diskless machine)? > > The barebox

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-02-05 Thread Antony Pavlov
On Wed, 31 Jan 2024 22:37:50 +0100 Ahmad Fatoum wrote: Hi All! > Hello Dan, > > On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: > > Hello! > > > > Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from > > NFSv4 filesystem into a Linux NFSv4 netroot (diskless machine)? > > The barebox

Re: NFSv4 boot support?

2024-01-31 Thread Ahmad Fatoum
Hello Dan, On 31.01.24 22:03, Dan Shelton wrote: > Hello! > > Does barebox support booting from a NFSv4 filesystem, e.g. boot from > NFSv4 filesystem into a Linux NFSv4 netroot (diskless machine)? The barebox network stack only does UDP/IP. There have been attempts to bring a TCP stack into