On 15:19 Mon 16 Jun , Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Matteo,
On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote:
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they
are quite different.
I started, as
Hi Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD,
On 06/19/2014 12:31 PM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
On 15:19 Mon 16 Jun , Bo Shen wrote:
Hi Matteo,
On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote:
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to
Hi Matteo,
On 06/13/2014 08:48 PM, Matteo Fortini wrote:
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they
are quite different.
I started, as advised by Sascha, to create into sam9_smc.c the
Hi,
I'm testing with a custom board. I have just with the applied test and
it's working ! I can use 8k page nand with atmel_nand driver.
Do I have to wait until Matteo's patches are applied or can I submit
mine right now ?
Best regards,
Raphaël Poggi
2014-06-13 3:26 GMT+02:00 Bo Shen
Hi all,
glad you found my patch useful. Sascha rejected it because he sees it
more fit to separate the initialization of sama5d3 and sam9 since they
are quite different.
I started, as advised by Sascha, to create into sam9_smc.c the function
void sama5d3_smc_configure(int id, int cs, struct
Hi,
I'm working on a series of patches, to support 8k nand page in
atmel_nand driver.
Currently, I can detect the nand and handle an oob size of 448. But i
have a problem with the pmecc, when barebox tried to perform pmecc
operation, I get the following message:
PMECC: Timeout to calculate
Hi Raphaël,
On 06/12/2014 08:28 PM, Raphaël Poggi wrote:
Hi,
I'm working on a series of patches, to support 8k nand page in
atmel_nand driver.
Currently, I can detect the nand and handle an oob size of 448. But i
have a problem with the pmecc, when barebox tried to perform pmecc
operation, I
