Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM AT91: Add missing on_flash_bbt in atmel_nand_data

2012-01-06 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 01:09:33PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 09:32 Fri 06 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:14:19PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > > wrote: > > > On 10:23 Thu 05 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > Signed-off-by: Sa

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM AT91: Add missing on_flash_bbt in atmel_nand_data

2012-01-06 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
On 09:32 Fri 06 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:14:19PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD > wrote: > > On 10:23 Thu 05 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > > > --- > > no please se use the right patch > > I would if you had sent it. I

Re: [PATCH] fs: fat: gen_numname() is only need with FS_FAT_WRITE

2012-01-06 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 09:29:18AM +0100, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:18:15PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > So, check for that config option, too. This will get rid of the warning: > > > > fs/fat/ff.c:878:13: warning: 'gen_numname' defined but not used > > > > I could ha

Re: [PATCH V2 0/3] Add MSystems Disk-On-Chip G3 support

2012-01-06 Thread Sascha Hauer
Hi Robert, On Fri, Jan 06, 2012 at 12:11:13AM +0100, Robert Jarzmik wrote: > Robert Jarzmik writes: > > This patchset brings support for M-Systems disk-on-chip G3 > > chips. Almost all code is taken from linux kernel (bitrev, > > bch, docg3), and slightly amended for barebox. > > Hi Sascha, happ

Re: [PATCH] ARM: move exception vectors away from start of binary

2012-01-06 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:17:12PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 10:23 Thu 05 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Traditionally U-Boot and barebox have the exception vectors at > > the start of the binary. There is no real reason in doing so, > > because in the majority of case

Re: [PATCH 1/3] ARM AT91: Add missing on_flash_bbt in atmel_nand_data

2012-01-06 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 02:14:19PM +0100, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote: > On 10:23 Thu 05 Jan , Sascha Hauer wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer > > --- > no please se use the right patch I would if you had sent it. Sascha -- Pengutronix e.K. |

Re: [PATCH] fs: fat: gen_numname() is only need with FS_FAT_WRITE

2012-01-06 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Jan 05, 2012 at 08:18:15PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote: > So, check for that config option, too. This will get rid of the warning: > > fs/fat/ff.c:878:13: warning: 'gen_numname' defined but not used > > I could have also moved the function further down, but I decided for the > least i