Re: [RFC v4 01/10] Add initial RISC-V architecture support

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:04:30 +0200 Daniel Schultz wrote: > Hi, > > > On 09/30/2017 01:57 PM, Antony Pavlov wrote: > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:07:09 +0200 > > Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> hm... mostly looks identical with existing arch

Re: [RFC v4 01/10] Add initial RISC-V architecture support

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:08:58 +0200 Daniel Schultz wrote: > Hi, > > > On 09/29/2017 02:07 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > Hi, > > > > hm... mostly looks identical with existing arch > > > > Am 29.09.2017 um 01:12 schrieb Antony Pavlov: > >> Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov

Re: [RFC v4 01/10] Add initial RISC-V architecture support

Hi, On 09/30/2017 01:57 PM, Antony Pavlov wrote: On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:07:09 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: Hi, hm... mostly looks identical with existing arch What do you mean when you say "existing arch"? ... Am 29.09.2017 um 01:12 schrieb Antony Pavlov: ...

Re: [RFC v4 01/10] Add initial RISC-V architecture support

Hi, Am 30.09.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Antony Pavlov: > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:07:09 +0200 > Oleksij Rempel wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> hm... mostly looks identical with existing arch > > What do you mean when you say "existing arch"? it is a note for me. I just compared it with

Re: [RFC v4 01/10] Add initial RISC-V architecture support

Hi, On 09/29/2017 02:07 PM, Oleksij Rempel wrote: Hi, hm... mostly looks identical with existing arch Am 29.09.2017 um 01:12 schrieb Antony Pavlov: Signed-off-by: Antony Pavlov -- TODOs: * split patch; --- arch/riscv/Kconfig | 73

Re: [RFC v4 01/10] Add initial RISC-V architecture support

On Mon, 2 Oct 2017 09:43:02 +0200 Oleksij Rempel wrote: > Hi, > > Am 30.09.2017 um 13:57 schrieb Antony Pavlov: > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:07:09 +0200 > > Oleksij Rempel wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> hm... mostly looks identical with existing