On Thu, May 12, 2022 at 10:54:37AM +0200, Bastian Krause wrote:
> Hi Sascha,
>
> On 5/12/22 09:03, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> > On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Bastian Krause wrote:
> > > NULL struct clk pointers should be treated just as the Linux kernel clk
> > > driver does [1]. The
Hi Sascha,
On 5/12/22 09:03, Sascha Hauer wrote:
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Bastian Krause wrote:
NULL struct clk pointers should be treated just as the Linux kernel clk
driver does [1]. The reasoning should also apply to the parent clk
argument.
A NULL struct clk pointer can
On Wed, May 11, 2022 at 12:09:11PM +0200, Bastian Krause wrote:
> NULL struct clk pointers should be treated just as the Linux kernel clk
> driver does [1]. The reasoning should also apply to the parent clk
> argument.
>
> A NULL struct clk pointer can happen for example on the Freescale i.MX6
>
Hello Bastian,
On 11.05.22 12:09, Bastian Krause wrote:
> NULL struct clk pointers should be treated just as the Linux kernel clk
> driver does [1]. The reasoning should also apply to the parent clk
> argument.
>
> A NULL struct clk pointer can happen for example on the Freescale i.MX6
> SABRE
