Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 11:53 -0800, John Smith wrote:
>> The device doesn't seem to be recognized.
>>
>> Is anyone working on this phone?
>>
>
> I think you're the first on the list to have one :)
>
> My partner may get a Bold or a Storm at some point.
Bold works just fine
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 11:53 -0800, John Smith wrote:
> The device doesn't seem to be recognized.
>
> Is anyone working on this phone?
>
I think you're the first on the list to have one :)
My partner may get a Bold or a Storm at some point.
--
adamw
---
The device doesn't seem to be recognized.
Is anyone working on this phone?
Once I free up some time, I'm going to work through the hacking doc and will
provide any useful info.
lsusb:
Bus 005 Device 003: ID 0fca:8007 Research In Motion, Ltd.
Device Descriptor:
bLength 18
bD
On Sat, Nov 29, 2008 at 05:45:47AM -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> My 8800 shows 500mA without any magic. Just rebooting it, removing
> kernel module, verifying hotplug is not going to change it .
>
> Yup,
> MaxPower 500mA
>
> This is an 8800 V4.5.0.55 (Platform 2.7.0.68). I think the
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 05:45 -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
>
>> This is an 8800 V4.5.0.55 (Platform 2.7.0.68). I think the Bold will
>> have an even newer OS.
>
> Bold and Storm run 4.7, IIRC.
The Bold would be 4.6...
--
On Sat, 2008-11-29 at 05:45 -0500, Rick Scott wrote:
> This is an 8800 V4.5.0.55 (Platform 2.7.0.68). I think the Bold will
> have an even newer OS.
Bold and Storm run 4.7, IIRC.
--
adamw
-
This SF.Net email is sponsored b
On Fri, 2008-11-28 at 23:14 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2008 at 10:52:27PM -0500, Martin Owens wrote:
> > Well I ran bcharge against it and it didn't even clock
> >
> > was I using it wrong? do these new phones not require bcharge?
>
> I believe they still do need bcharge.
My 8800
