On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:58:51PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> I have a CentOS4 system (server parts only) and see that it's even
> more dumb than I thought; a new patch is on the way, I made the
> initial macro definitions as lowly basic as possible, which makes it a
> lot more portable. Basically
On 3/8/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I've tested the build on a RHEL4 system just now, and rpm-4.3 chokes
> on the %if statements for some reason. I also had to tweak the autoconf
I have a CentOS4 system (server parts only) and see that it's even
more dumb than I thought; a new pa
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:47:18PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> (sent using wrong email address, trying a resend. sorry if I break
> your email client threading)
It worked fine.
First of all, Thanks! This is a great benefit, and should make version 0.7
the first release with binary RPM's included
(sent using wrong email address, trying a resend. sorry if I break
your email client threading)
On 3/3/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I don't really care to put system specific stuff in the makefiles
> when, in my opinion, this stuff probably belongs in the binary packages
> anyway.
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 12:49:35PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> OK I played around last night and took some notes; the short comment
> here is that "btool/bcharge et. al are a no brainer, gui/ creates some
> options how to do it". So I'd like to get some feedback on which way
> you want to go before
On 3/2/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:58:20PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> > Surely -- when I get time I'll cook it up and submit, it will of
>
> Sounds great, thanks!
(long winded here, sorry)
OK I played around last night and took some notes; the short comm
Fri, 2 Mar 2007 19:02:46
To:Barry project development discussion
Subject: Re: [Barry-devel] RPM spec file patch
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:58:20PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> Surely -- when I get time I'll cook it up and submit, it will of
> course be a bit more difficult since I'
On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 03:58:20PM -0800, troy engel wrote:
> Surely -- when I get time I'll cook it up and submit, it will of
> course be a bit more difficult since I'll be playing with the real
> Makefiles, but nothing too bad. I've made a few hundred over the
> years. ;) I'll try and whip it up
On 3/2/07, Chris Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You seem to have a good handle on the RPM side of things. Would you be
Surely -- when I get time I'll cook it up and submit, it will of
course be a bit more difficult since I'll be playing with the real
Makefiles, but nothing too bad. I've made
Hi Troy,
Thanks very much for your RPM spec file patch. I'm impressed that root
is not needed, according to your patch notes.
You seem to have a good handle on the RPM side of things. Would you be
willing to create the RPM spec files for the full Barry release? This
is something I'd really lik
10 matches
Mail list logo
