On Thu, Mar 05, 2009 at 08:28:39AM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> That's working for me in btool now! I will check against libopensync
> (0.22 since the .3x still doesn't support work with evolution per
> Nicolas's message last night) later today.
For the .3x branch, you have to use :
svn checkout -
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 12:35:51AM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> Tested the huge sync and seems to be working as it should. Looks like
> your latest patch did the trick!
Thanks for your reports, guys! And for all your help in testing.
Considering that this seemed to fix a similar issue on Mac OS
Tested the huge sync and seems to be working as it should. Looks like
your latest patch did the trick!
--
Paul O'Keefe
VOIP:1-770-250-5165
FindMe: 1-678-967-4103
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 23:18 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:03:46PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> > Chris
btool works fine now. opensync hangs. I have over 4,000 contacts so will
do a bit of diagnostics work by deleting them and doing a sync against
some simple small databases.
--
Paul O'Keefe
VOIP:1-770-250-5165
FindMe: 1-678-967-4103
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 23:18 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
>
That's working for me in btool now! I will check against libopensync
(0.22 since the .3x still doesn't support work with evolution per
Nicolas's message last night) later today.
--
Paul O'Keefe
VOIP:1-770-250-5165
FindMe: 1-678-967-4103
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 23:18 -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
Chris,
This change fixes the issue on Mac OS X as well. I have only tested
bjavaloader, but I will give the rest of the tools a thorough once over
sometime soon.
Regards,
- Josh
On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 23:18:42 -0500
Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:03:46PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:03:46PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> Chris and I have been investigating a device hang on a BB 8330. The
> following patch is minimalist, should not affect the overall speed of
> the library and limits the change to very low level code.
Hi Paul,
I've added a different p
drop the usleep in at the bottom of the first bulkwrite routine. I was
using usleep 125000 there and it was working. I'm not running inside a
VM and doubt I will be tonight (little matter of a beverage I just
tipped over into my x86_64 box which is where the horsepower and space
to run would have b
On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 12:42:52AM -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> That timeout bug is not gone yet. :-) I can now reproduce it in a VM,
> according to kernel version, with even .28.4 having issues.
Clarification: timeout bug = btool giving timeout depending on kernel
1ms bug = the gdb
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:36:12PM -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:27:43PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> > It is. I was repeating that same series of steps. The disassembly of
> > ProbePair showed the 500 being pushed in as well. I was in the process
> > of downloading another
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 11:27:43PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> It is. I was repeating that same series of steps. The disassembly of
> ProbePair showed the 500 being pushed in as well. I was in the process
> of downloading another debugger when this came in.
The odd thing is that I'm getting a ti
It is. I was repeating that same series of steps. The disassembly of
ProbePair showed the 500 being pushed in as well. I was in the process
of downloading another debugger when this came in.
--
Paul O'Keefe
VOIP:1-770-250-5165
FindMe: 1-678-967-4103
On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 23:14 -0500, Chr
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 10:41:21PM -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:44PM -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> > I'll do a quick check with gdb on the systems I have handy.
>
> Yes! I've reproduced the 1ms bug in Debian Lenny in a VM.
>
> Now to track it down and squash it...
Turns
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:49:44PM -0500, Chris Frey wrote:
> I'll do a quick check with gdb on the systems I have handy.
Yes! I've reproduced the 1ms bug in Debian Lenny in a VM.
Now to track it down and squash it...
- Chris
---
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:41:32PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> I'll keep looking at the 1ms issue. I haven't compiled on my x86_64
> machine in a few days. If it repeats there, it could be an ubuntu
> toolchain issue.
>
> What distro are you using? I can install in a VM and compile there to c
On Thu, Feb 26, 2009 at 09:03:46PM -0500, Paul O'Keefe wrote:
> Chris and I have been investigating a device hang on a BB 8330. The
> following patch is minimalist, should not affect the overall speed of
> the library and limits the change to very low level code.
Thanks Paul. This is where I'd ha
16 matches
Mail list logo
