Re: [basex-talk] BaseX in maven

2015-02-11 Thread Christian Grün
Hi Wendell, I haven't done this by myself (personally, I tend to work with the start scripts), but if you decide to do everything with Maven, it's surely an option to do so! Cheers, Christian On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Wendell Piez wap...@wendellpiez.com wrote: Hi again Dirk and

[basex-talk] Basex 8.0: white-spaces left after delete node?

2015-02-11 Thread Hondros, Constantine (ELS-AMS)
Hi all, Using Basex 8.0, I notice a difference in behaviour compared to Basex 7.82 that I thought worth mentioning. After creating a 5 GB db, then pruning it down to roughly 2GB using Xquery 'delete node', and after running db:optimize, in the GUI Result window I see vst areas of

Re: [basex-talk] Basex 8.0: white-spaces left after delete node?

2015-02-11 Thread Christian Grün
Hi Constantine, I'm not sure what may be the reason here. Could you possibly provide us with an SSCCE? Thanks in advance, Christian On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 9:33 PM, Hondros, Constantine (ELS-AMS) c.hond...@elsevier.com wrote: Hi all, Using Basex 8.0, I notice a difference in behaviour

Re: [basex-talk] BaseX in maven

2015-02-11 Thread Wendell Piez
Christian, thanks! (Dirk, can you offer any hint as to how a maven plugin-or-whatnot could set up to start the BaseX GUI? Or should I simply mess around till this pops out? Christian doesn't seem to think this is prima facie a bad idea) Thanks! Wendell On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 1:31 PM,

Re: [basex-talk] test if a namespace prefix is declared

2015-02-11 Thread Emmanuel Chateau
Thanks a lot ! It helps really (as you do always). Emmanuel Le 11 févr. 2015 à 09:01, Christian Grün christian.gr...@gmail.com a écrit : An addendum: XQuery 3.1 will provide a new function fn:load-xquery-module [1]. We haven't implemented it so far, as we first need to sort out various

Re: [basex-talk] test if a namespace prefix is declared

2015-02-11 Thread Christian Grün
An addendum: XQuery 3.1 will provide a new function fn:load-xquery-module [1]. We haven't implemented it so far, as we first need to sort out various questions first. It may also be that the specification changes along with the first implementations. But it may be something similar to what you