Re: [basex-talk] Web sockets and BaseX

Hi Marco, hi France, Thanks for the feedback on creating web sockets. Feel free to tell us how the BaseX code could be modified to get it embedded more smoothly. Best, Christian On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 3:46 PM, Marco Lettere wrote: > Hi France, > I can confirm that for

Re: [basex-talk] Web sockets and BaseX

Hi France, I can confirm that for using websocket you'll have to write some Java code. That's what we've done for creating a Jetty Connector that is able to accept websocket connections from HTML5 apps running inside browsers. Then we interact from inside XQuery by using the mechanism of Java

Re: [basex-talk] map:merge new semantics for 8.6

Thanks Christian, I feared as much ;-( I understand the reasoning (processing efficiency and compatibility with parse-json) but find it unfortunate that backwards compatibility wasn't part of the reasoning as maps and map:merge are not exactly new. --Marc On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:50 PM,

Re: [basex-talk] map:merge new semantics for 8.6

Hi Marc, The reason is why this was decided by the W3C; see [1] and related comments. Sorry for that, Christian [1] https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=29723 On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 1:43 PM, Marc van Grootel wrote: > Hi, > > Any reason why the deault

[basex-talk] map:merge new semantics for 8.6

Hi, Any reason why the deault semantics for map:merge in 8.6 changed in a backwards incompatible manner? Is this because of some XQuery/XPath spec thing? A while ago I switched to 8.6-SNAPSHOT just to be on the latest and greatest and I starting seeing weird things in my code. Initially I didn't

[basex-talk] Web sockets and BaseX

Has anyone implemented a solutions that uses web sockets with BaseX? I've been doing some work with socket.io and node.js, but all the research I've done on Jetty points to the need to create .java files that manage the connection on the server side. Does that mean I'd need a BaseX module to