Re: [basex-talk] Java bindings - ambiguous Signature

2014-01-11 Thread Christian GrĂ¼n
Hi Andy, > It generates the error > Signature 'org.apache.tika.Tika.parse' is ambiguous > > Which maybe it is from some perspectives :-). In the latest snapshot, I have updated the error feedback to: Several implementations found for 'Q{org.apache.tika.Tika}parse#1'. But a better solution wou

Re: [basex-talk] Java bindings - ambiguous Signature

2014-01-03 Thread Andy Bunce
Yes and I have now done that for this case. However when prototyping it is sometimes nice to quickly try things out to see what might work without the burden of firing up a Java IDE, managing the source etc. Regards /Andy On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:05 AM, Florent Georges wrote: > Yet another

Re: [basex-talk] Java bindings - ambiguous Signature

2014-01-03 Thread Florent Georges
Yet another solution (probably the one I prefer) would be to write your own Java class, exposing exactly the API you need, taking care of the interface between XQuery and Java, and deferring actual hard work to the library. Regards, -- Florent Georges http://fgeorges.org/ http://h2oconsultin

Re: [basex-talk] Java bindings - ambiguous Signature

2014-01-03 Thread Andy Bunce
Or maybe better with a pragma e.g. return tika:parse( (# basex:java-type java:java.io.File #){$file} ) On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Andy Bunce wrote: > Hi, > > In my ongoing attempts to use various Java libraries, without writing any > Java myself, I have trying Apache Tika. > (http:

[basex-talk] Java bindings - ambiguous Signature

2014-01-02 Thread Andy Bunce
Hi, In my ongoing attempts to use various Java libraries, without writing any Java myself, I have trying Apache Tika. (http://tika.apache.org/1.4/api/org/apache/tika/Tika.html). With the tika jar on the classpath I hoped the following would work: import module namespace tika = "java:org.apache.t